Common errors of reasoning in child protection work.

@article{Munro1999CommonEO,
  title={Common errors of reasoning in child protection work.},
  author={Eileen Munro},
  journal={Child abuse & neglect},
  year={1999},
  volume={23 8},
  pages={
          745-58
        }
}
OBJECTIVE Repeated public inquiries into child abuse tragedies in Britain demonstrate the level of public concern about the services designed to protect children. These inquiries identify faults in professionals' practice but the similarities in their findings indicate that they are having insufficient impact on improving practice. This study is based on the hypothesis that the recurrent errors may be explicable as examples of the typical errors of human reasoning identified by psychological… CONTINUE READING
BETA

Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 96 CITATIONS

The use of assessment tools in child protection: an ethnomethodological study

VIEW 10 EXCERPTS
CITES BACKGROUND & METHODS
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

FILTER CITATIONS BY YEAR

2001
2019

CITATION STATISTICS

  • 19 Highly Influenced Citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 47 REFERENCES

Human judgement and social policy. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Humberside Child Protection Committee

K. Scotland HMSO. Hammond
  • 1996
VIEW 4 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

Report of Overview Group into the circumstances surrounding the death of Leanne White

Nottinghamshire Area Child Protection Committee.
  • Nottingham, England: Nottinghamshire County Council.
  • 1994

Report of overview group into the circumstances surrounding the death of Leanne White

Nottinghamshire Area Child Protection Committee.
  • Nottingham, England: Nottinghamshire County Council.
  • 1994

Evaluating child protection services: Findings and issues

Social Services Inspectorate.
  • London: Department of Health.
  • 1993