Common Core Standards

  title={Common Core Standards},
  author={Andrew C Porter and Jennifer McMaken and Jun Hwang and Rui Yang},
  journal={Educational Researcher},
  pages={103 - 116}
The Common Core standards released in 2010 for English language arts and mathematics have already been adopted by dozens of states. Just how much change do these new standards represent, and what is the nature of that change? In this article, the Common Core standards are compared with current state standards and assessments and with standards in top-performing countries, as well as with reports from a sample of teachers from across the country describing their own practices. 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Challenging the Research Base of the Common Core State Standards

The widely adopted Common Core State Standards (CCSS) call for raising the level of text complexity in textbooks and reading materials used by students across all grade levels in the United States;

Integrating the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics in a Secondary School

Integrating the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics in a Secondary School by Danielle Holmes Campbell MS, Walden University, 2005 BA, Dillard University, 2000 Doctoral Study Submitted in

A Comparison of Higher-Order Thinking Between the Common Core State Standards and the 2009 New Jersey Content Standards in High School

The creators and supporters of the Common Core State Standards claim that the Standards require greater emphasis on higher-order thinking than previous state standards in mathematics and English

A case study of sense-making of the Common Core State Standards for mathematics by elementary generalists

Forty-five state departments of education have adopted and implemented the Common Core State Standards for mathematics. The standards contain reform mathematics language that is abstract and

English Language Proficiency Standards Aligned With Content Standards

A critique of ELP standards developed by the two major consortia of states, WIDA and ELPA21, focuses on how each consortium addresses two aspects of alignment: disciplinary practices across content areas and cognitive expectations across proficiency levels.

New Teachers’ Implementation of the Common Core State Standards

This study investigates new teachers’ challenges in implementing the secondary mathematics and English Common Core State Standards (CCSS) using a survey approach that addressed 17 secondary

Aligned Curricula and Implementation of Common Core State Mathematics Standards

T his report pres ents findings from a survey of the American Teacher Panel (ATP) teachers conducted in the spring of 2016 and follows up on a previous survey of teachers conducted in the spring of

Common Core State Standards: The Promise for College and Career Ready Students in the U.S.

Following the National Education Summit in 2000, the National Governors Association and the Council for Chief State School Officers proposed the Common Core State Standards for mathematics and

Slope across the Curriculum: Principles and Standards for School Mathematics and Common Core State Standards.

This article provides an initial comparison of the Principles and Standards for School Mathematics and the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics by examining the fundamental notion of slope.



Is There a de Facto National Intended Curriculum? Evidence From State Content Standards

State content standards are the backbone of the standards-based reform movement. Content standards provide teachers with a set of guidelines for what students are expected to know and be able to do,

How Well Aligned Are State Assessments of Student Achievement With State Content Standards?

Coherence is the core principle underlying standards-based educational reforms. Assessments aligned with content standards are designed to guide instruction and raise achievement. The authors

A Survey Measuring Elementary Teachers' Implementation of Standards-Based Mathematics Teaching

Intensive case study is an expensive tool for measuring teachers' instructional practice. Previous research suggests that teacher self-report surveys provide a low-cost and relatively accurate

Why Schools Matter: A Cross-National Comparison of Curriculum and Learning

This work examines the relationship between content measurement categories for the TIMSS Framework, teachers, and TIMSS Test, and the structure of the Curriculum and Learning in the context of two-level mathematics education.

Evaluating Alignment Between Curriculum, Assessment, and Instruction

The authors describe the three most common methods for evaluating the alignment between state content standards and assessments and conclude that choice of alignment method depends on the specific goals of a state or district.

What Do Test Scores in Texas Tell Us

We examine the results on the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS), the highest-profile state testing program and one that has recorded extraordinary recent gains in math and reading scores. To

How the world ’ s best-performing school systems come out on top September

1 Executive summary Education reform is top of the agenda of almost every country in the world. Yet despite massive increases in spending (last year, the world's governments spent $2 trillion on

Measuring the Content of Instruction: Uses in Research and Practice

This article describes tools for measuring the content of instruction, the content of instructional materials, and the alignment between these. Illustrative findings about the use of these tools are

Measuring Instructional Practice: Can Policymakers Trust Survey Data?

Policymakers' new interest in reforming teaching has created a demand for accurate data on instructional practice. Most such data come from teacher surveys, although the accuracy of these surveys in

The Evaluation of Principals: What and How Do States and Urban Districts Assess Leadership?

In this article we present results of a comprehensive review of principal leadership assessment practices in the United States. Our analyses of both the general content and the usage of 65