Commentary on Tuch

  title={Commentary on Tuch},
  author={C. Alberini},
  journal={Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association},
  pages={317 - 330}
  • C. Alberini
  • Published 2015
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association
  • I n “Problems Applying Neuroscientific Research to the Clinical Setting,” Richard Tuch challenges the idea that neuroscientific findings on memory reconsolidation, the process by which memories can become fragile upon retrieval (Alberini 2011; Nader and Einarsson 2010), might be useful or even correctly interpreted in psychoanalysis and, in general, in the context of psychotherapeutic applications. He expresses “concern about a tendency to accept neuroscientific findings without rigorously… CONTINUE READING

    Topics from this paper.


    Memory Reconsolidation, Trace Reassociation and the Freudian Unconscious
    • 8
    Memory Reconsolidation: Lingering Consolidation and the Dynamic Memory Trace
    • 14
    Memory reconsolidation, emotional arousal, and the process of change in psychotherapy: New insights from brain science.
    • 240
    • PDF
    Does Reconsolidation Occur in Humans?
    • 169
    • PDF
    The Formation and Stability of Recognition Memory: What Happens Upon Recall?
    • 52
    • PDF
    Rites of Passage of the Engram Reconsolidation and the Lingering Consolidation Hypothesis
    • 389
    • PDF
    Preventing the return of fear in humans using reconsolidation update mechanisms
    • 931
    • PDF
    Extinction-Reconsolidation Boundaries: Key to Persistent Attenuation of Fear Memories
    • 698
    • PDF
    The role of metaplasticity mechanisms in regulating memory destabilization and reconsolidation
    • 137