Commentary II: Considering the changing nature of work: the New Zealand perspective

Abstract

Soz.Präventivmed. 48 (2003) 351–353 0303-8408/03/060351–03 DOI 10.1007/s00038-003-0027-0 © Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2003 The New Zealand context The monitoring of work has become an increasingly pressing issue because, as Sauter and Murphy (2003) point out, the changes in western market economies, and the associated effects on working life, have been nothing short of dramatic. New Zealand is no different in this regard. Perhaps what does distinguish the situation in New Zealand is the rate and extent of change. There is reasonable agreement that the “New Zealand experiment” has resulted in one of the most successful but most dramatically changed modern market economies, transforming New Zealand from one of the most regulated of the developed economies to one of the least regulated (McMillan 1998). In particular, the liberalisation of employment laws has allowed employers much greater flexibility in employment contracts reflected in significant adjustments to many conditions of work, all of which can be expected to have an impact on the health of workers and their families (see Feyer & Broom 2001 for a review).

DOI: 10.1007/s00038-003-0027-0

Cite this paper

@article{Feyer2003CommentaryIC, title={Commentary II: Considering the changing nature of work: the New Zealand perspective}, author={Anne-Marie Feyer and Rebecca Lilley}, journal={Sozial- und Pr{\"a}ventivmedizin}, year={2003}, volume={48}, pages={351-353} }