Comment on Hekman's "Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited": Truth or Justice?

@article{Hartsock1997CommentOH,
  title={Comment on Hekman's "Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited": Truth or Justice?},
  author={Nancy C. M. Hartsock},
  journal={Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society},
  year={1997},
  volume={22},
  pages={367 - 374}
}
  • N. Hartsock
  • Published 1 January 1997
  • Philosophy
  • Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society
gS U SAN H E K MAN'S ARTICLE (in this issue) begins with a good summary of the current situation of feminist standpoint theories. She makes several important points that are often unrecognized in discussions of standpoint theories. First, she notes that standpoint theories come in a variety of forms. Second, she argues that these theories must be understood as a counterhegemonic discourse, that is, as centrally concerned with politics. And third, she reminds us that at least my version of… 
Standpoint theory is dead, long live standpoint theory! Why standpoint thinking should be embraced by scholars who do not identify as feminists?
This paper explores the applicability of standpoint theory within and outside of feminism by examining a journal debate in Signs about standpoint theory from 1997. The debate took place at a crucial
25 Years of Feminist Empiricism and Standpoint Theory: Where Are We Now?
Over the past twenty-five years, numerous articles in Hypatia have clarified, revised, and defended increasingly more nuanced views of both feminist empiricism and standpoint feminism. Feminist
Against Epistemological Chasms: The Science Question in Feminism Revisited
  • S. Walby
  • Philosophy
    Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society
  • 2001
he rejection of "science" by some feminists has been core to the development of alternative epistemologies, whether standpoint or postmodern (Harding 1986, 1991; Nicholson 1990), despite the argument
Feminist Critique and the Realistic Spirit
abstract:Contemporary debates over the future of critique, feminist or otherwise, tend to neglect if not perpetuate a reliance on the philosophical tradition, with its disdain for the contingent and
Feminist Standpoint Theory: Conceptualization and Utility
  • L. Gurung
  • Sociology
    Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology
  • 2020
Feminist Standpoint theory challenges the notion of conventional scientific practices that had excluded women from the inquiry and marginalize them in every aspect of knowledge benefits and
Reading Antonio Gramsci as a Methodologist
In this paper the author connects conceptual and methodological development, typically presented as distinct processes. She argues that these processes are—or should be—underpinned by a common
SITUATING FEMINIST EPISTEMOLOGY
ABSTRACT Feminist epistemologies hold that differences in the social locations of inquirers make for epistemic differences, for instance, in the sorts of things that inquirers are justified in
Curricular standpoints and native feminist theories: Why native feminist theories should matter to curriculum studies
Abstract In this article I provide a brief overview of feminist standpoint theories, as well as how Native feminist theories complicate and enrich this political and epistemic tradition. Following
Violence and voice: using a feminist constructivist grounded theory to explore women’s resistance to abuse
This article describes the rationale for the choice of constructivist grounded theory methodology in a research project which explored women’s responses to intimate partner violence. In view of the
Australian Sovereignty, Indigenous Standpoint Theory and Feminist Standpoint Theory
Much has been written by non-Indigenous Australians in the wake of the 1992 Mabo case following its rejection of terra nullius in Australia. What is surprising about this literature is the lack of
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 25 REFERENCES
Comment on Hekman's "Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited"
  • D. Smith
  • Art
    Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society
  • 1997
I HAVE WRITTEN THIS grudgingly. Susan Hekman's (in this issue) interpretation of my work is so systematically out to lunch that it is difficult to write a response that does not involve a replication
The man question : visions of subjectivity in feminist theory
Turning on its head that familiar "woman question," this innovative work poses masculinity as a problem that requires explanation. Ferguson rebukes the sense of coherence contained in patriarchal
Ludic Feminism and After: Postmodernism, Desire, and Labor in Late Capitalism
Following the equal-rights struggles of the 1960s, feminism became involved in the theoretical problems posed by poststructuralism, psychoanalysis, semiotics, queer theory, postcolonialism, and
Feminism: The Political Conscience of Postmodernism?
In these, the twilight years of Marxism (so it seems in the industrialized West), a phrase still echoes through the shabby halls of left theory, halls now bustling with better-dressed post-Marxists
Yearning: Race, Gender, and Cultural Politics
A new collection of critical essays from bell hooks takes as its theme the deep longing for a critical voice. I explore some motifs that operate across the divergent topics of her essays. She writes
Materialist feminism and the politics of discourse
Acknowledgments. Introduction. 1. Materialist Feminism in the Postmodern Academy: Toward a Global Social Analytic 2. The Materiality of Discourse: Feminism and Post-Marxism 3. The Feminist
Further selections from the prison notebooks
This volume brings together Gramsci's writings on religion, education, science, philosophy and economic theory. The theme that links these writings is the investigation of ideology at its different
Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse
From the Publisher: Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan Meets_OncoMouse explores the roles of stories, figures, dreams, theories, facts, delusions, advertising, institutions, economic
Selections from the prison notebooks
ion, but it leads nobody to think that one fly equals one elephant. The rules of formal logic are abstractions of the same kind, they are like the grammar of normal thought; but they still need to be
...
...