Coloring Single Stroop Elements: Reducing Automaticity or Slowing Color Processing?

@article{Monahan2001ColoringSS,
  title={Coloring Single Stroop Elements: Reducing Automaticity or Slowing Color Processing?},
  author={John S. Monahan},
  journal={The Journal of General Psychology},
  year={2001},
  volume={128},
  pages={112 - 98}
}
  • J. S. Monahan
  • Published 2001
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • The Journal of General Psychology
Abstract Automaticity theory and the effect of coloring a single element were tested with all or only 1 element colored in Stroop tasks. The 312 participants in 5 experiments indicated stimulus presentation color by key press. Experiments 1 and 2 replicated those of D. Besner, J. A. Stoltz, and C. Boutilier (1997) with some changes, and revealed similar results: less Stroop interference with only 1 letter colored. Besner et al. (1997) interpreted the results as indicating that coloring a single… Expand
Coloring Only a Single Letter Does Not Eliminate Color-Word Interference in a Vocal-Response Stroop Task: Automaticity Revealed
  • H. Marmurek
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • The Journal of general psychology
  • 2003
TLDR
Coloring a single letter in a word reduced interference in vocal responding or eliminated it in manual responding, but the results of Experiment 3 showed that semantic effects are not eliminated by coloring only a singleletter. Expand
Attentional Focus Manipulations Affect Naming Latencies of Neutral But Not of Incongruent Stroop Trials
People are slower and more error-prone when indicating the color of incongruent color words compared to that of neutral stimuli. This Stroop effect results from the concurrent semantic analysis ofExpand
Comparing perception of Stroop stimuli in focused versus divided attention paradigms: Evidence for dramatic processing differences
TLDR
Evidence supports the traditional interference account of the Stroop effect, but also supports a non-interference parallel processing account ofThe word and the color in the divided attention task. Expand
The Role of Visual Stimuli in Cross-Modal Stroop Interference.
TLDR
The finding suggests that while the impact of the auditory stimuli is consistent and robust, the influence of non-word visual stimuli is quite small and unreliable and, while occasionally being statistically significant, it is not practically so. Expand
A brief review of three manipulations of the Stroop task focusing on the automaticity of semantic access
Since Stroop (1935), semantic access has been seen as automatic but today this is questioned, following minor modifications of the Stroop task. Besner, Stolz and Boutilier (1997) showed that coloringExpand
Influence de la présentation bicolore des mots sur l'effet Stroop
Manwell, Roberts, and Besner (2004) recently reported the absence of a semantically based Stroop effect (i.e., slower color naming latencies for color-associated words than for color-neutral words)Expand
Behavioral and electrophysiological investigation of semantic and response conflict in the Stroop task
TLDR
The behavioral and ERP results conjointly suggest that the Stroop-related Ninc is sensitive to semantic rather than to response and/or general conflict, which is more negative for standard-incongruent and color-associated than for color-neutral items. Expand
EFFECTS OF PRACTICE ON STROOP CONGRUITY
Automaticity, both reading and response, response competition, translation models, and the imbalance/uncertainty model of the Stroop effect were investigated. Two participants received four weeks ofExpand
Social priming of dyslexia and reduction of the Stroop effect: What component of the Stroop effect is actually reduced?
TLDR
In the vocal format, dyslexia priming reduces but does not eliminate the normal magnitude of the interference-based Stroop-like findings and that this reduction is solely due to the control of processes involved in the selection of a response - processes that are known to be controllable in this format. Expand
The loci of Stroop effects: a critical review of methods and evidence for levels of processing contributing to color-word Stroop effects and the implications for the loci of attentional selection.
TLDR
The literature does not provide clear evidence for a distinction between conflicting and facilitating representations at phonological, semantic and response levels (together referred to as informational conflict), and it is argued that the evidence for task conflict as being distinct from informational conflict is strong. Expand
...
1
2
3
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 20 REFERENCES
Stroop Interference: An Input and an Output Phenomenon
Three theories of Stroop interference are considered: perceptual conflict theory (Hock and Egeth, 1970), response competition theory (Morton, 1969) and conceptual encoding theory (Seymour, 1977). TheExpand
The stroop effect and the myth of automaticity
TLDR
This outcome flies in the face of any automaticity account in which specified processes cannot be prevented from being set in motion, but it is consistent with the venerable idea that mental set is a powerful determinant of performance. Expand
Unconsciously controlled processing: the stroop effect reconsidered
TLDR
This view is challenged by a series of three experiments in which the presence/absence of a Stroop effect depends on whether all of the target elements are colored or not, in conjunction with whether the target and the spatially distinct color word distractor belong to the same domain or not. Expand
The Stroop Phenomenon: Some Critical Tests of the Response Competition Hypothesis
  • P. M. Nealis
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Perceptual and motor skills
  • 1973
TLDR
It was found that interference in the naming of colors could be generated by congruous, as well as incongruous, color-word stimulus combinations. Expand
SEMANTIC POWER MEASURED THROUGH THE INTERFERENCE OF WORDS WITH COLOR-NAMING.
  • G. S. Klein
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • The American journal of psychology
  • 1964
TLDR
The sources of the word's power to interfere with color-naming and the events involved in the interference itself have not received much attention. Expand
Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review.
TLDR
It is concluded that recent theories placing the explanatory weight on parallel processing of the irrelevant and the relevant dimensions are likely to be more sucessful than are earlier theories attempting to locate a single bottleneck in attention. Expand
Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions
Interference or inhibition (the terms seem to have been used almost indiscriminately) has been given a large place in experimental literature. The investigation was begun by the physiologists priorExpand
What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect?
TLDR
An intersection of three literatures (skilled word recognition, spatial attention, and the Stroop effect) is addressed and it is suggested that thedefault value for spatial attention in visual word recognition is distributed across the word, and precuing a single letter position serves to narrow the focus of spatial attention. Expand
UNINTENTIONAL WORD READING VIA THE PHONOLOGICAL ROUTE : THE STROOP EFFECT WITH CROSS-SCRIPT HOMOPHONES
Single-route theories that argue that access to meaning is always mediated by phonology are consistent with process theories of automaticity. Dual-route theories, suggesting that reading skillExpand
A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing.
TLDR
The data suggest that the latency and accuracy of overt behavioral responses are a function of a response activation process controlled by an evaluation process that accumulates evidence gradually, a response priming process that is independent of stimulus evaluation, and a response competition process. Expand
...
1
2
...