Colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer: the outcomes of two recruitment methods.

@article{Corbett2004ColonoscopySF,
  title={Colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer: the outcomes of two recruitment methods.},
  author={Mike C Corbett and Sharon L Chambers and Bruce Shadbolt and Lybus C Hillman and Doug Taupin},
  journal={The Medical journal of Australia},
  year={2004},
  volume={181 8},
  pages={
          423-7
        }
}
OBJECTIVES To determine the response to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by colonoscopy, through direct invitation or through invitation by general practitioners. DESIGN AND SETTING Two-way comparison of randomised population sampling versus cluster sampling of a representative general practice population in the Australian Capital Territory, May 2002 to January 2004. INTERVENTION Invitation to screen, assessment for eligibility, interview, and colonoscopy. SUBJECTS 881 subjects aged 55… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 12 CITATIONS

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 26 REFERENCES

A randomized study of screening for colorectal cancer using faecal occult blood testing : results after 13 years and seven diennial screening rounds

  • OD Jorgensen, O Kronborg, C Fenger
  • Gut
  • 2002

Colon cancer screening

  • RW Burt
  • Gastroenterology
  • 2000

Risk of proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colonoscopic findings

  • TF Imperiale, DR Wagner, CY Lin
  • N Engl J Med
  • 2000

Use of colonoscopy to screen average risk for CRC

  • DA Lieberman, DG Weiss, JH Bond
  • N Engl J Med
  • 2000

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…