Collective Intelligence in Computer-Mediated Collaboration Emerges in Different Contexts and Cultures

@article{Engel2015CollectiveII,
  title={Collective Intelligence in Computer-Mediated Collaboration Emerges in Different Contexts and Cultures},
  author={David Engel and Anita Williams Woolley and Ishani Aggarwal and Christopher F. Chabris and Masamichi Takahashi and Keiichi Nemoto and Carolin Kaiser and Young Ji Kim and Thomas W. Malone},
  journal={Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems},
  year={2015}
}
  • David EngelA. Woolley T. Malone
  • Published 18 April 2015
  • Psychology
  • Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Collective intelligence (CI) is a property of groups that emerges from the coordination and collaboration of members and predicts group performance on a wide range of tasks. Previous studies of CI have been conducted with lab-based groups in the USA. We introduce a new standardized online battery to measure CI and demonstrate consistent emergence of a CI factor across three different studies despite broad differences in (a) communication media (face-to-face vs online), (b) group contexts (short… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Deep Structures of Collaboration

Collective intelligence (CI), a group’s capacity to perform a wide variety of tasks, is a key factor in successful collaboration. Group composition, particularly diversity and member social

Quantifying collective intelligence in human groups

It is shown that CI is predicted by the proportion of women in the group, mediated by average social perceptiveness of group members, and that it predicts performance on various out-of-sample criterion tasks, and it is found that, overall, group collaboration process is more important in predicting CI than the skill of individual members.

Adolescent's Collective Intelligence: Empirical Evidence in Real and Online Classmates Groups

Among adolescents, online groups performance was negatively affected by participants’ average perception of group cohesion, the difficulty of the problem, and the number of communicative exchanges that occur in the interaction.

The insensitive ruins it all

A group’s collective intelligence reflects its capacity to perform well across a variety of cognitive tasks and it transcends the individual intelligence of its members. Previous research shows that

The Insensitive Ruins It All: Compositional and Compilational Influences of Social Sensitivity on Collective Intelligence in Groups

The empirical results indicate that collectively intelligent groups are those in which the least socially sensitive group member has a rather high score on social sensitivity, and (socially sensitive) group members cannot compensate for the lack of social sensitivity of the other group members.

Collective intelligence in teams: Contextualizing collective intelligent behavior over time

This manuscript aims to extend the understanding of CI in teams, by disentangling the core of actual collective intelligent team behavior that unfolds over time during a collaboration period, and proposes a more direct, thorough, and nuanced understanding of collective intelligence in teams.

What Makes a Strong Team?: Using Collective Intelligence to Predict Team Performance in League of Legends

In this study of teams playing the online game League of Legends, it is found that CI does, indeed, predict the competitive performance of teams controlling for the amount of time played as a team.

Investigating group performance in high-school-students. A new model of collective intelligence in online environments

: Humans organize in teams to overcome complex problems and succeed in a large variety 1 of tasks. This emergent property of groups to display higher intelligence than singles is called 2 collective

Not As Smart As We Think: A Study of Collective Intelligence in Virtual Groups

The results of this study studied groups that used computer-mediated communication to investigate whether collective intelligence is similar or different when groups work using CMC, suggesting that collective intelligence manifests itself differently depending on context.

Collective Intelligence and Group Performance

This work focuses on two influences on a group’s collective intelligence: group composition and group interaction, which affects the members’ skills, diversity, and intelligence.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 48 REFERENCES

Not As Smart As We Think: A Study of Collective Intelligence in Virtual Groups

The results of this study studied groups that used computer-mediated communication to investigate whether collective intelligence is similar or different when groups work using CMC, suggesting that collective intelligence manifests itself differently depending on context.

Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups

A psychometric methodology for quantifying a factor termed “collective intelligence” (c), which reflects how well groups perform on a similarly diverse set of group problem-solving tasks, and finds converging evidence of a general collective intelligence factor that explains a group’s performance on a wide variety of tasks.

Taking it out of context: collaborating within and across cultures in face-to-face settings and via instant messaging

The quantitative results combined with conversation analysis suggest that the groups viewed the task differently--AA pairs as an exercise in situation-specific compromise; CC as consensus-reaching; and performance.

Knowledge and Performance in Knowledge-Worker Teams: A Longitudinal Study of Transactive Memory Systems

TMSs were positively related to team viability and team performance, suggesting that developing a TMS is critical to the effectiveness of knowledge-worker teams.

Reading the Mind in the Eyes or Reading between the Lines? Theory of Mind Predicts Collective Intelligence Equally Well Online and Face-To-Face

A collective intelligence factor characterizes group performance approximately as well for online groups as for face-to-face groups; and surprisingly, the ToM measure is equally predictive of collective intelligence in both face- to-face and online groups, even though the online groups communicate only via text and never see each other at all.

Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams : Much more than g

The authors propose (a) that team members' general cognitive ability (g) and conscientiousness are key resources for hierarchical decision-making teams with distributed expertise ; (b) that a

Do Smarter Teams Do Better

This study reports the results of several meta-analyses examining the relationship between four operational definitions of cognitive ability within teams (highest member score, lowest member score,

Ideal Cycles of Communication (or Cognitions) in Triads, Dyads, and Individuals

The relationship between the quality of communication cycles and performance was tested for triad and dyads, and the relationship between thought cycles and performance was tested for individuals.

A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks

A formal model of information seeking is proposed in which the probability of seeking information from another person is a function of knowing what that person knows; valuing what thatperson knows; being able to gain timely access to that person's thinking; and perceiving thatseeking information from that person would not be too costly.

Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams

Virtual teams, i.e., work groups in which members collaborate from distant locations predominantly based on electronic communication media, are increasingly introduced in organizations due to new