• Corpus ID: 102495

Collective Intelligence Quanitifed for Computer-Mediated Group Problem Solving

  title={Collective Intelligence Quanitifed for Computer-Mediated Group Problem Solving},
  author={Dan Steinbock and Craig A. Kaplan and Michael A. Rodriguez and Juana Diaz and Newton Der and Suzanne Garcia},
Collective Intelligence (CI) is the ability of a group to exhibit greater intelligence than its individual members. Expressed by the common saying that "two minds are better than one," CI has been a topic of interest for social psychology and the information sciences. Computer mediation adds a new element in the form of distributed networks and group support systems. These facilitate highly organized group activities that were all but impossible before computer mediation. This paper presents… 
2 Citations

Figures and Tables from this paper

Smartocracy: Social Networks for Collective Decision Making
The Smartocracy network data structures, the suite of collective decision making algorithms currently supported, and the results of two collective decisions regarding the design of the system are discussed.
Determinants of collective intelligence quality: comparison between Wiki and Q&A services in English and Korean users
Although web-enabled collective intelligence (CI) plays a critical role in organizational innovation and collaboration, the dubious quality of CI is still a substantial problem faced by many CI


Collective Intelligence and its Implementation on the Web: Algorithms to Develop a Collective Mental Map
The creation of a network of pheromone trails by ant colonies points to some basic mechanisms of CMM development: averaging of individual preferences, amplification of weak links by positive feedback, and integration of specialised subnetworks through division of labor.
Adaptive Task Allocation Inspired by a Model of Division of Labor in Social Insects
A recently proposed model of division of labor in a colony of primitively eusocial wasps, based on a simple reinforcement of response thresholds, can be transformed into a decentralized adaptive algorithm of task allocation.
Suppressing the contribution of the group's best member: is GDSS use appropriate for all group tasks?
  • R. Gallupe
  • Psychology
    Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  • 1990
A major paradigm of group decision-making research is the study of the differences between individual and group decision making. In particular, this research has focused on the decision quality of
Cognitive Feedback in GDSS: Improving Control and Convergence
Developers should include cognitive feedback as an integral part of the GDSS at ever level and the human-computer interaction should be designed so there is an intuitive and effective transaction across the components of feedback at all levels.
Using a GDSS to Facilitate Group Consensus: Some Intended and Unintended Consequences
In a task requiring resolution of competing personal preferences, 82 groups - the largest sample size in the GDSS literature to date - were randomly assigned to one of three experiment conditions: a computer-based support system (GDSS), a manual, paper and pencil, support system; or no support whatsoever.
A foundation for the study of group decision support systems
A conceptual overview of GDSS based on an information-exchange perspective of decision making is presented, and a multi-dimensional taxonomy of systems is proposed as an organizing framework for research in the area.
Group versus individual performance: are n + 1 heads better than one?" psychological bulletin
Experimental comparisons of groups and individuals were analyzed on four dimensions: task, process, individual differences, and methodology. A standardized terminology based on Lorge, Fox, Davitz,
An empirical study of task type and communication medium in GDSS
The authors investigate the effects of task type and communication medium on group decision outcome in GDSS (group decision support system)-supported meetings and found face-to-face groups achieved higher consensus change and experienced higher decision satisfaction and higher decision scheme satisfaction than dispersed groups.
Some Liberating Effects of Anonymous Electronic Brainstorming
The high productivity of electronic brainstorming groups has been attributed to several factors, one of which is anonymity. The authors assessed the role of anonymity by randomly assigning