Collective Identity Formation and the International State

  title={Collective Identity Formation and the International State},
  author={Alexander Wendt},
  journal={American Political Science Review},
  • Alexander Wendt
  • Published 1 June 1994
  • Political Science
  • American Political Science Review
The neorealist-neoliberal debate about the possibilities for collective action in international relations has been based on a shared commitment to Mancur Olson's rationalist definition of the problem as one of getting exogenously given egoists to cooperate. Treating this assumption as a de facto hypothesis about world politics, I articulate the rival claim that interaction at the systemic level changes state identities and interests. The causes of state egoism do not justify always treating it… Expand
Progress in International Politics: Procedural Liberalism and Global Collective Identity
This paper advances the core theoretical claims of my larger dissertation project, which proposes a theory of progress in international politics. Disturbed by the dearth of literature on progress inExpand
Hierarchy under anarchy: informal empire and the East German state
Contemporary international politics embody a tension between formal equality and de facto inequality. States recognize each other as sovereign equals, yet the strong still push around the weak. AmongExpand
International identity construction and the liberal peace
Abstract Previous explanations of the ‘exceptionalist’ character of the democratic peace have failed to present a theoretical challenge to the Realist model of international politics. This paperExpand
From Process to Politics
Many international relations (IR) theories examining the identity/alterity nexus share a dichotomized vision of the social and political reality sustaining their approach to “identity” by dividingExpand
The Politics of Inclusion
In this article I examine the Baltic states' return to Europe through the prism of collective identity formation. I argue that the European Union during the 1990s has been articulating a `politics ofExpand
Social Psychology and the Identity-Conflict Debate: Is a ‘China Threat’ Inevitable?
Are the relations among nations inevitably conflictual? Neorealism and neoliberalism share the rationalist assumption that states are self-regarding, but debate over whether states pursue relative orExpand
Identity Theorizing in International Relations Theories
Collective identity provides policy elites with a shared worldview through which the international environment is collectively interpreted; and this, in turn, presents them with a set of images thatExpand
Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics
This article reformulates liberal international relations (IR) theory in a nonideological and nonutopian form appropriate to empirical social science. Liberal IR theory elaborates the insight thatExpand
Wendt's Blindspot: The limits of the (re)construction of collective identity and why the self-help system cannot be overcome.
The objective of this article is to identify the limits of Wendt’s (1992, 1994) theory, in which he suggests the possibility of states to overcome the self-help system through the creation of aExpand
The constructivist turn in international relations theory
In recent years, constructivist thinking about global politics has brought a breath of fresh air to international relations. By exploring questions of identity and interest, constructivist scholarsExpand


The agent-structure problem in international relations theory
While neorealism and world-system theory both claim to be “structural” theories of international relations, they embody very different understandings of system structure and structural explanation.Expand
Analyzing change in international politics: The new institutionalism and the interpretative approach
This paper argues that realism misinterprets change in the international system. Realism conceives of states as actors and international regimes as variables that affect national strategies.Expand
The assumption of anarchy in international relations theory: a critique *
‘ Anarchy is one of the most vague and ambiguous words in language.’ George Coreewall Lewis, 1832. In much current theorizing, anarchy has once again been declared to be the fundamental assumptionExpand
International regimes, transactions, and change: embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order
The prevailing model of international economic regimes is strictly positivistic in its epistemological orientation and stresses the distribution of material power capabilities in its explanatoryExpand
National identity and the idea of European unity
Since the project of European integration began, at issue has always been whether a European political identity could develop to underpin political unification. Is a genuine European identityExpand
Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis
Kenneth Waltz's recent book, Theory of International Politics , is one of the most important contributions to international relations theory since his Man, the State and War . It picks up where theExpand
Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics
The debate between realists and liberals has reemerged as an axis of contention in international relations theory.’ Revolving in the past around competing theories of human nature, the debate is moreExpand
Kant and the Kantian paradigm in international relations
Although few in number and limited in scope, Kant's writings on international relations have had a lasting influence and have given rise to a wide range of interpretations. Kant's famous pamphlet,Expand
Transnational Relations as a Threat to the Democratic Process
Transnational relations and other multional process seriously threaten democratic control of foreign policy, particularly in advanced industrial societies. The intermeshing of decisionmaking acrossExpand
Between Celebration and Despair: Constructive Suggestions for Future International Theory
Just as contemporary global politics are in a state of dramatic flux, so are theories of international relations. A significant aspect of the “Third Debate” now in progress concerns exactly whatExpand