Collaborative recall and collective memory: What happens when we remember together?

  title={Collaborative recall and collective memory: What happens when we remember together?},
  author={Celia B. Harris and Helena M. Paterson and Richard I Kemp},
  pages={213 - 230}
Studies of collective memory have traditionally been the domain of philosophers and sociologists, while cognitive psychologists have largely investigated memory at the level of the individual. However, within cognitive psychology there is a variety of psychological theories and experimental paradigms that have been used to study the process and outcomes of remembering in groups. In this paper we review the research on group remembering and draw together findings from different traditions. In… 
(Induced) Forgetting to form a collective memory
How communities forge collective memories has been a topic of long-standing interest among social scientists and, more recently, psychologists. However, researchers have typically focused on how what
Collaborative Memory: Cognitive Research and Theory
The cognitive components of this complex phenomenon are elucidated and an overarching theoretical framework that specifies the cognitive mechanisms associated with the costs and benefits of collaboration on memory is proposed.
Collaborative Remembering: When Can Remembering With Others Be Beneficial?
Experimental memory research has traditionally focused on the individual, and viewed social influence as a source of error or inhibition. However, in everyday life, remembering is often a social
Joint remembering: Cognition, communication and interaction in processes of memory-making
This article provides a new cognitive- and discourse-based theory to memory research. Despite the fact that a large proportion of studies in memory research are based on investigations of
Bridging the gap between the social science and the social ontology of collective memory
It is commonplace to attribute memories to groups of individuals both large and small. Attributions of memories to groups are also found in social science research. This article proposes using
Learning and Remembering with Others: The Key Role of Retrieval in Shaping Group Recall and Collective Memory.
Collaboration impaired the group recall product at both time points, but especially so at retrieval, and only collaborative retrieval played a significant role in the formation of collective memories.
Couples as socially distributed cognitive systems: Remembering in everyday social and material contexts
In everyday life remembering occurs within social contexts, and theories from a number of disciplines predict cognitive and social benefits of shared remembering. Recent debates have revolved around
Transactive Memory Systems: A Mechanistic Analysis of Emergent Group Memory
Wegner, Giuliano, and Hertel (1985) defined the notion of a transactive memory system (TMS) as a group level memory system that “involves the operation of the memory systems of the individuals and
We Remember, We Forget: Collaborative Remembering in Older Couples
Transactive memory theory describes the processes by which benefits for memory can occur when remembering is shared in dyads or groups. In contrast, cognitive psychology experiments demonstrate that
The development of collective remembering
This essay outlines a sociocultural, developmental approach to collective memory. This work is grounded in Halbwachs’ (1950/1980) theory of collective memory and in recent prospective studies of


Collective memory: Conceptual foundations and theoretical approaches
While collective remembering involves individual minds, it also suggests something more in the form of socially situated individuals, a claim that can usefully be formulated in terms of how members of a groups share a common set of cultural tools and similar content.
Towards a psychology of collective memory
The place of psychology within the now voluminous social scientific literature on collective memory is discussed, distinguishing between the design of social resources and memory practices, on one hand, and on the other, the effectiveness of each in forming and transforming the memories held by individuals and the psychological mechanisms that guide this effectiveness.
Finding Meaning in Memory: A Methodological Critique of Collective Memory Studies
The memory wave in the humanities has contributed to the impressive revival of cultural history, but the success of memory studies has not been accompanied by significant conceptual and
Putting Communication into the Study of Group Memory
In the spirit of viewing human memory as a social process, Pavitt (2003) revisited the idea of group memory-recollection of information that occurs collaboratively in groups. This paper outlines and
Collective memory: A perspective from (experimental) clinical psychology
It is argued that a factual focus induced by collaborative remembering may be beneficial to natural recovery in the immediate aftermath of trauma, and proposed that shared remembering techniques may provide a useful addition to the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder.
Collective memory: collaborative and individual processes in remembering.
There was evidence that the collaborative groups tended to rely on the best individual to a greater extent in story than in list recall, and group recall appeared to be more stable over time than individual recall.
On the formation of collective memories: The role of a dominant narrator
It is argued that the formation of a collective memory through conversation is not inevitable but is limited by cognitive factors, such as conditions for social contagion, and by situational factors,such as the presence of a narrator.
Colloquy: Do interacting groups perform better than aggregates of individuals?: Why we have to be reductionists about group memory
Recent examples of research about group processes melding individual-cognitive and social communicative factors have resulted in the application of concepts relevant to individual cognition to groups
Are two heads better than one? Experimental investigations of the social facilitation of memory.
The hypothesis that two people collaborating in recall would remember more than a single person was examined in a series of four experiments. All the experiments used variations on the same
Communication, Learning, and Retrieval in Transactive Memory Systems☆☆☆
A laboratory experiment examined the impact of communication during learning and during recall on collective recall. Dating couples and dyads of strangers worked together to learn and later recall