Coherence in quantum error-correcting codes

@inproceedings{Beale2018CoherenceIQ,
  title={Coherence in quantum error-correcting codes},
  author={Stefanie J. Beale and Joel J. Wallman and Mauricio Guti'errez and Kenneth R. Brown and Raymond Laflamme},
  year={2018}
}
Typical studies of quantum error correction assume probabilistic Pauli noise, largely because it is relatively easy to analyze and simulate. Consequently, the effective logical noise due to physically realistic coherent errors is relatively unknown. Here, we prove that encoding a system in a stabilizer code and measuring error syndromes decoheres errors, that is, causes coherent errors to converge toward probabilistic Pauli errors, even when no recovery operations are applied. Two practical… 
The Effects of Quantum Error Correction on Noisy Systems
Full accuracy simulations of quantum systems are very costly, and as a result most studies of quantum error correction assume a probabilistic Pauli error model, largely because such errors can be
Efficient Estimation of Pauli Channels
Pauli channels are ubiquitous in quantum information, both as a dominant noise source in many computing architectures and as a practical model for analyzing error correction and fault tolerance.
Mitigating coherent noise using Pauli conjugation
TLDR
This Article devise a way to search for the optimal Pauli conjugation scheme and apply it to Steane code, 9-qubit Shor code and distance-3 surface code under global coherent $$Z$$ Z noise and show improvement in logical fidelity over twirling.
Testing a quantum error-correcting code on various platforms
TLDR
This work proposes a simple quantum error-correcting code for the detected amplitude damping channel that requires only two qubits and implements the encoding, the channel, and the recovery on an optical platform, the IBM Q System, and a nuclear magnetic resonance system.