Cognitive Biases in Recruitment, Selection, and Promotion: The Risk of Subconscious Discrimination

@inproceedings{Whysall2018CognitiveBI,
  title={Cognitive Biases in Recruitment, Selection, and Promotion: The Risk of Subconscious Discrimination},
  author={Z. Whysall},
  year={2018}
}
This chapter reviews the extant literature regarding the existence of implicit bias in key selection, recruitment, and promotion decision-making processes. It includes an analysis of the impact of stereotyping on screening of resumes, in-group bias in interviews, the impact of stereotype threat on candidate performance, and interviewer confirmation bias. This substantial body of evidence suggests that to tackle discrimination caused by implicit bias in the modern workplace, a different approach… Expand
Predictably Irrational Hiring
The hiring process plays a key role in organisational performance, but it involves contentious judgements and decisions. Behavioural economics can help us improve hiring effectiveness and enable theExpand
THE INFLUENCE OF RESUME QUALITY AND ETHNICITY CUES ON EMPLOYMENT DECISIONS
This study examined the effects of resume writing quality and ethnicity cues on employment decisions. Prior research on resume quality is scant and no prior studies have examined the role of bothExpand
Inequality and Organisational Practice: Work and Welfare
This chapter aims to discuss the key elements of the first volume and highlight the main areas for exploration. It provides an evaluation on the meaning of hidden inequalities in modern organisationsExpand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 81 REFERENCES
Implicit sources of bias in employment interview judgments and decisions
Abstract This study empirically examined implicit sources of bias in employment interview judgments and decisions. We examined two ethnic cues, accent and name, as sources of bias that may triggerExpand
Why your stigma isn't hired : a dual-process framework of interview bias
The job interview is one of the most widely used assessment tools in the selection process. Despite its popularity in practice, interview outcomes can be prone to bias. Although our knowledge ofExpand
Addressing Stereotype Threat is Critical to Diversity and Inclusion in Organizational Psychology
TLDR
This review focused on underexplored areas including effects of stereotype threat beyond test performance and the application of brief, low-cost interventions in the workplace. Expand
A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making.
TLDR
Men were preferred for male-dominated jobs, whereas no strong preference for either gender was found for female-dominated or integrated jobs and gender-role congruity bias did not differ between decisions that required comparisons among ratees and decisions made about individual ratees. Expand
The Relative Resistance of the Situational, Patterned Behavior, and Conventional Structured Interviews to Anchoring Effects
Selection interviews are decision-making tools used in organizations to make hiring and promotion decisions. Individuals who conduct such interviews, however, are susceptible to deviations fromExpand
The Effect of an Intervention to Break the Gender Bias Habit for Faculty at One Institution: A Cluster Randomized, Controlled Trial
TLDR
An intervention that facilitates intentional behavioral change can help faculty break the gender bias habit and change department climate in ways that should support the career advancement of women in academic medicine, science, and engineering. Expand
A head for hiring: the behavioural science of recruitment and selection
I refer you to a report the CIPD commissioned in August 2015, A head for hiring: The behavioural science of recruitment and selection. The report illustrates that recruitment processes are oftenExpand
Stereotype Threat Deconstructed
More than a decade of research has demonstrated that individuals underperform in situations that remind them that they are stereotyped to do poorly. This paper explores the psychological processesExpand
Gender, Race, and Meritocracy in Organizational Careers1
TLDR
It is shown that gender, race, and nationality differences continue to affect salary growth after performance ratings are taken into account, ceteris paribus, demonstrating a critical challenge faced by the many contemporary employers who adopt merit‐based practices and policies. Expand
Kicking the habit: Effects of nonstereotypic association training and correction processes on hiring decisions
The primary aim of the present research was to examine the effect of training in associating nonstereotypic traits with men and women on hiring decisions. While previous findings demonstrate thatExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...