Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design

@article{Hartson2003CognitivePS,
  title={Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design},
  author={H. Hartson},
  journal={Behaviour & Information Technology},
  year={2003},
  volume={22},
  pages={315 - 338}
}
  • H. Hartson
  • Published 2003
  • Computer Science
  • Behaviour & Information Technology
  • In reaction to Norman's (1999) essay on misuse of the term affordance in human-computer interaction literature, this article is a concept paper affirming the importance of this powerful concept, reinforcing Norman's distinctions of terminology, and expanding on the usefulness of the concepts in terms of their application to interaction design and evaluation. We define and use four complementary types of affordance in the context of interaction design and evaluation: cognitive affordance… CONTINUE READING

    Paper Mentions

    Affordances in HCI: toward a mediated action perspective
    • 164
    • PDF
    Conceptualizing design affordances from a cognitive perspective
    • 4
    • PDF
    Affordance in Consideration of a Feature of Platform Action Game
    User Experiences with Personal Intelligent Agents: A Sensory, Physical, Functional and Cognitive Affordances View
    • 6
    • Highly Influenced

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 72 REFERENCES
    Affordances: Clarifying and Evolving a Concept
    • 395
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Affordances: Clarifying and Evolving a Concep
    • 352
    • Highly Influential
    Technology affordances
    • 1,018
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Time affordances: the time factor in diagnostic usability heuristics
    • 40
    Fitts ' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction
    • 942
    • PDF
    Affordance, conventions, and design
    • 1,384
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    The user action framework: a reliable foundation for usability engineering support tools
    • 125
    • PDF
    Interacting with virtual environments: an evaluation of a model of interaction
    • 67