Coercive Citation in Academic Publishing

@article{Wilhite2012CoerciveCI,
  title={Coercive Citation in Academic Publishing},
  author={Alan W. Wilhite and Eric A. Fong},
  journal={Science},
  year={2012},
  volume={335},
  pages={542 - 543}
}
Many journal editors appear to strategically target authors and papers to pressure them into citing the editors' journals. Despite their shortcomings (1–4), impact factors continue to be a primary means by which academics “quantify the quality of science” (5). One side effect of impact factors is the incentive they create for editors to coerce authors to add citations to their journal. Coercive self-citation does not refer to the normal citation directions, given during a peer-review process… 
Detecting potential reference list manipulation within a citation network
TLDR
Examining a subset of active, highly published authors in PubMed, the frequency of non-self citations to one author coming from one paper approximates Zipf’s law and the Gini Index is proposed as a simple means of quantifying skew in this distribution and tested against a series of “red flag” metrics that are expected to result from RLM attempts.
Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research
TLDR
Widespread misattribution is found in publications and in research proposals with significant variation by academic rank, discipline, sex, publication history, co-authors, etc.
Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study.
A generalized view of self-citation: direct, co-author, collaborative, and coercive induced self-citation.
Self-citation Analysis using Sentence Embeddings
TLDR
A large-scale analysis of journal self-citations is conducted while taking into consideration the similarity between a publication and its references and compute similarities of article-reference pairs using sentence embeddings.
Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication
TLDR
The involvement of scientific authors, reviewers, editors, publishers, indexers, and learned associations in the citing and referencing to preserve the integrity of science communication is overviewed.
Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Editor Behavior through Potentially Coercive Citations
TLDR
To the best of the knowledge, this is a pioneering work on coercive citations for personal (editors’) benefit and editorial teams should be aware about this type of potentially unethical behavior and act accordingly.
A bibliometric investigation of the journals that were repeatedly suppressed from Clarivate's Journal Citation Reports.
Journals indexed by Clarivate are temporarily suppressed from the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) if their Journal Impact Factor (JIF) scores are distorted through excessive self-citations or citation
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-7 OF 7 REFERENCES
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
TLDR
Alternative methods for evaluating research are being sought, such as citation rates and journal impact factors, which seem to be quantitative and objective indicators directly related to published science.
Journal accused of manipulating impact factor
The journal Leukemia , which is owned by Macmillan magazines, has been accused of trying to manipulate its impact factor, the measure used to rank the importance of scientific journals. The
The politics of publication
TLDR
Authors, reviewers and editors must act to protect the quality of research in the face of threats to research integrity.
The number that's devouring science
The Faculty Research & Books Government & Politics Money & Management Information Technology Students Athletics International Community Colleges Short Subjects Gazette Corrections Opinion & Forums
Publication Manual of the APA
  • APA
  • 2010
Survey details are available in the SOM. The survey remains open for participation: www