Codon usage comparison of novel genes in clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae

Abstract

A similarity statistic for codon usage was developed and used to compare novel gene sequences found in clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae with a reference set of 80 prokaryotic, eukaryotic and viral genomes. These analyses were performed to obtain an indication as to whether individual genes were Haemophilus-like in nature, or if they probably had more recently entered the H.influenzae gene pool via horizontal gene transfer from other species. The average and SD values were calculated for the similarity statistics from a study of the set of all genes in the H.influenzae Rd reference genome that encoded proteins of 100 amino acids or longer. Approximately 80% of Rd genes gave a statistic indicating that they were most like other Rd genes. Genes displaying codon usage statistics >1 SD above this range were either considered part of the highly expressed group of H.influenzae genes, or were considered of foreign origin. An alternative determinant for identifying genes of foreign origin was when the similarity statistics produced a value that was much closer to a non-H.influenzae reference organism than to any of the Haemophilus species contained in the reference set. Approximately 65% of the novel sequences identified in the H.influenzae clinical isolates displayed codon usages most similar to Haemophilus sp. The remaining novel sequences produced similarity statistics closer to one of the other reference genomes thereby suggesting that these sequences may have entered the H.influenzae gene pool more recently via horizontal transfer.

Extracted Key Phrases

11 Figures and Tables

Cite this paper

@article{Gladitz2005CodonUC, title={Codon usage comparison of novel genes in clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae}, author={John Gladitz and Kai Shen and Patricia T Antalis and Fen Hu and James Christopher Post and Garth D. Ehrlich}, journal={Nucleic Acids Research}, year={2005}, volume={33}, pages={3644 - 3658} }