Closure Principles and the Laws of Conservation of Energy and Momentum

@article{Gibb2010ClosurePA,
  title={Closure Principles and the Laws of Conservation of Energy and Momentum},
  author={Sophie C. Gibb},
  journal={Dialectica},
  year={2010},
  volume={64},
  pages={363-384}
}
  • S. Gibb
  • Published 2010
  • Philosophy
  • Dialectica
The conservation laws do not establish the central premise within the argument from causal overdetermination - the causal completeness of the physical domain. Contrary to David Papineau (2000 and 2002), this is true even if there is no non-physical energy. The combination of the conservation laws with the claim that there is no non-physical energy would establish the causal completeness principle only if, at the very least, two further causal claims were accepted. First, the claim that the only… Expand
Conservation Laws and the Philosophy of Mind: Opening the Black Box, Finding a Mirror
Since Leibniz’s time, Cartesian mental causation has been criticized for violating the conservation of energy and momentum. (Non-epiphenomenalist property dualism is analogous.) Many dualistExpand
Causal closure of the physical, mental causation, and physics
The argument from causal closure of the physical (CCP) is usually considered the most powerful argument in favor of the ontological doctrine of physicalism. Many authors, most notably Papineau,Expand
How Dualists Should (Not) Respond to the Objection from Energy Conservation
The principle of energy conservation is widely taken to be a serious difficulty for interactionist dualism (whether property or substance). Interactionists often have therefore tried to make itExpand
Conservation of Energy: Missing Features in Its Nature and Justification and Why They Matter
Misconceptions about energy conservation abound due to the gap between physics and secondary school chemistry. This paper surveys this difference and its relevance to the 1690s–2010s LeibnizianExpand
General Relativity, Mental Causation, and Energy Conservation
The conservation of energy and momentum have been viewed as undermining Cartesian mental causation since the 1690s. Modern discussions of the topic tend to use mid-19th century physics, neglectingExpand
Metaphysical necessity dualism
  • B. White
  • Philosophy, Computer Science
  • Synthese
  • 2016
TLDR
This paper presents and defends a form of dualism that implements a response to the Exclusion Argument for physicalism by using a dispositional essentialist view of properties to argue that the psychophysical laws linking mental events to their physical bases are metaphysically necessary. Expand
Where to Look for Emergent Properties
Recent years have seen renewed interest in the emergence issue. The contemporary debate, in contrast with that of past times, has to do not so much with the mind–body problem as with the relationshipExpand
How To Get Rid of Closure
Sophie Gibb has recently invented a very interesting strategy against Kim’s causal exclusion argument. This strategy adopts the powers theory of causation and an interpretation of mental causation inExpand
Mind–Body Interaction and Modern Physics
The idea that mind and body are distinct entities that interact is often claimed to be incompatible with physics. The aim of this paper is to disprove this claim. To this end, we construct a broadExpand
Theories of the Mind and Theories of Causation
Explaining how various theories about the nature of mind can accommodate mental causation requires some groundwork. It requires formulating these theories about the nature of mind more precisely. ItExpand
...
1
2
3
4
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 43 REFERENCES
What Does the Conservation of Energy Have to Do with Physicalism
The conservation of energy law, a law of physics that states that the total energy of any closed system is always conserved, is a bedrock principle that has achieved both broad theoretical andExpand
Does Interactionism Violate a Law of Classical Physics
The interactionist holds that a non-physical mind initiates behaviour by exerting a force which moves a particle in the brain. Leibniz, D. C. Dennett and James W. Cornman argue that (A) the motionExpand
Causation and the flow of energy
Causation has traditionally been analyzed either as a relation of nomic dependence or as a relation of counterfactual dependence. I argue for a third program, a physicalistic reduction of the causalExpand
Causal Closure Principles and Emergentism
Causal closure arguments against interactionist dualism are currently popular amongst physicalists. Such an argument appeals to some principles of the causal closure of the physical, together withExpand
Mental Causation
Classical mechanics is formulated without reference to conscious experience. Quantum mechanics, in contrast, is, both by design, and in actual practice, a theory of relationships between the actionsExpand
On the grammar of ‘cause’
A recent trend in philosophical literature concerning the concept of causation has been to speak of causes in terms of manipulation or the ability to control certain facets of nature. One perniciousExpand
EMERGENTISM, IRREDUCIBILITY, AND DOWNWARD CAUSATION
Several theories of emergence will be distinguished. In particular, these are synchronic, diachronic, and weak versions of emergence. While the weaker theories are compatible with propertyExpand
Mental States, Natural Kinds and Psychophysical Laws
I. Suppose (i) that there are causal relations between mental and physical events, (ii) that where there is causality a covering law exists which subsumes the events under some of their descriptions,Expand
Conservation of Energy is Relevant to Physicalism
I argue against Barbara Montero's claim that Conservation of Energy (CoE) has nothing to do with physicalism. I reject her reconstruction of the argument for physicalism from CoE, and offer anExpand
Functionalism and broad content
The contents of certain intentional states are broad or context-bound. The contents of some beliefs (and desires and hopes. . .) depend on how things are outside the subject in addition to dependingExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...