Clitoral variation says nothing about female orgasm.

  title={Clitoral variation says nothing about female orgasm.},
  author={David John Hosken},
  journal={Evolution & development},
  volume={10 4},
In a recent article, Wallen and Lloyd (2008) conclude that clitoral structures are not under direct selection and state that the data on clitoral length variation instead support suggestions that female orgasm in humans is not adaptive; by adaptive they seem to mean subject to selection rather than only subject to natural selection. Their conclusions are reached because (1) in comparison to males, females orgasm less frequently during sex (the variation in female orgasm rates [or ease of orgasm… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 1 time over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS
3 Citations
12 References
Similar Papers


Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 12 references

Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice

  • W. G. Eberhard
  • Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • 1996
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

A resolution to the lek paradox

  • A. Pomiankowski, A. P. M ller
  • Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260: 21–29.
  • 1995

Patterns of variation in tail ornament size in birds

  • R. V. Alatalo, J. Hoglund, A. Lundberg
  • Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 34: 363–374.
  • 1988
1 Excerpt

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…