Clinicians' views on the feasibility of surgical randomized trials in urogynecology: results of a questionnaire survey.

@article{Bakali2011CliniciansVO,
  title={Clinicians' views on the feasibility of surgical randomized trials in urogynecology: results of a questionnaire survey.},
  author={Evangelia Bakali and Emma Pitchforth and Douglas G Tincello and S. E. Kenyon and Mark R. Slack and Philip Toozs-Hobson and Christopher J Mayne and David R.H. Jones and David Taylor},
  journal={Neurourology and urodynamics},
  year={2011},
  volume={30 1},
  pages={
          69-74
        }
}
AIMS To survey the views of clinicians (urologists and gynecologists) about a proposed randomized surgical trial comparing two approaches for the treatment of women with urinary incontinence and vaginal prolapse. METHODS A questionnaire survey nested within a pilot randomized controlled trial of colposuspension versus anterior repair plus TVT (CARPET1) for women with incontinence and anterior vaginal prolapse. Members of the UK Continence Society, British Society of Urogynaecology, and… CONTINUE READING
BETA

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.

Explore Further: Topics Discussed in This Paper

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-7 OF 7 CITATIONS

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 34 REFERENCES

The challenges faced in the design, conduct and analysis of surgical randomised controlled trials

  • JA Cook
  • Trials
  • 2009
1 Excerpt

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…