Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16

  title={Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16},
  author={Jean-Louis Vincent and Andrew Rhodes and Azriel Perel and Greg S Martin and Giorgio Della Rocca and Beno{\^i}t Vallet and Michael R. Pinsky and Christoph Karl Hofer and Jean-Louis Teboul and Willem P. de Boode and Sabino Scolletta and Antoine Vieillard-Baron and Daniel De Backer and Keith R. Walley and Marco Maggiorini and Mervyn Singer},
  booktitle={Critical care},
Hemodynamic monitoring plays a fundamental role in the management of acutely ill patients. With increased concerns about the use of invasive techniques, notably the pulmonary artery catheter, to measure cardiac output, recent years have seen an influx of new, less-invasive means of measuring hemodynamic variables, leaving the clinician somewhat bewildered as to which technique, if any, is best and which he/she should use. In this consensus paper, we try to provide some clarification, offering… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 8 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.
114 Citations
18 References
Similar Papers


Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 114 extracted citations


Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 18 references

Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1A in critically ill patients

  • LE Lelyveld-Haas, AR van Zanten, GF Borm, DH Tjan
  • Eur J Anaesthesiol
  • 2008
1 Excerpt

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…