Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays compared to composite restorations.

Abstract

This study compared the clinical performance of indirectly manufactured ceramic Evopress inlays with those of directly placed, fine particle hybrid Filtek Z250 composite restorations in posterior teeth. From January 2000 to October 2003, 109 patients received 264 Evopress (Wegold) ceramic inlays and 68 patients received 145 Filtek Z250 (3M ESPE) composite… (More)
DOI: 10.2341/08-95

Topics

Cite this paper

@article{Lange2009ClinicalEO, title={Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays compared to composite restorations.}, author={Ralf-Thomas Lange and Peter W. Pfeiffer}, journal={Operative dentistry}, year={2009}, volume={34 3}, pages={263-72} }