Clinical efficacy of immediate implant loading protocols compared to conventional loading depending on the type of the restoration: a systematic review.

@article{SanzSnchez2015ClinicalEO,
  title={Clinical efficacy of immediate implant loading protocols compared to conventional loading depending on the type of the restoration: a systematic review.},
  author={Ignacio Sanz-S{\'a}nchez and Ignacio Sanz-Mart{\'i}n and Elena Figuero and Mariano Sanz},
  journal={Clinical oral implants research},
  year={2015},
  volume={26 8},
  pages={964-982}
}
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Immediate loading has become a predictable option to restore all clinical situations. The aim of this systematic review was to assess whether immediate loading protocols achieve comparable clinical outcomes when compared to conventional loading protocols depending on the type of prosthetic restoration. METHODS A protocol was developed aimed to answer the following focused question: "What are the effects of immediate implant loading protocols compared to conventional… CONTINUE READING

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 10 extracted citations

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…