Clinical comparison of the effectiveness of single-file reciprocating systems and rotary systems for removal of endotoxins and cultivable bacteria from primarily infected root canals.

@article{Martinho2014ClinicalCO,
  title={Clinical comparison of the effectiveness of single-file reciprocating systems and rotary systems for removal of endotoxins and cultivable bacteria from primarily infected root canals.},
  author={F C Martinho and Ana Paula Martins Gomes and Alet{\'e}ia Massula Fernandes and Nadia de Souza Ferreira and Marcos S{\'e}rgio Endo and L. Mirian F. Freitas and Izabel Coelho Gomes Cam{\~o}es},
  journal={Journal of endodontics},
  year={2014},
  volume={40 5},
  pages={625-9}
}
INTRODUCTION This clinical study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of single-file reciprocating systems and rotary systems in removing endotoxins and cultivable bacteria from primarily infected root canals. METHODS Forty-eight primarily infected root canals were selected and randomly divided into 4 groups: WaveOne (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) (n = 12); Reciproc (VDW, Munich, Germany) (n = 12), ProTaper (Dentsply Maillefer) (n = 12), and Mtwo (VDW) (n = 12). Samples… CONTINUE READING

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 14 extracted citations

Rotary versus reciprocating shaping files in bacterial elimination from long oval canals.

Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc • 2017
View 1 Excerpt

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 36 references

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…