Climate justice and rights-based litigation in a post-Paris world

  title={Climate justice and rights-based litigation in a post-Paris world},
  author={Charles Beauregard and D’Arcy Carlson and Stacy‐ann Robinson and Charles Cobb and Mykela Patton},
  journal={Climate Policy},
  pages={652 - 665}
ABSTRACT In spite of the 2015 Paris Agreement requiring all Parties, irrespective of their development status, to take climate action, the operationalization of climate justice in global climate governance and policy has been fraught. Other avenues, such as litigation, have emerged as a policy tool for seeking redress for past and prospective harm resulting from climate change. The academic and policy literatures have, however, had limited engagement with the role of rights-based litigation in… 

A just alternative to litigation: applying restorative justice to climate-related loss and damage

Abstract Climate litigation is increasingly a feature of international climate policy. However, loss and damage cases have mostly been unsuccessful due to tensions around uncertainty, attribution,

Toward transformative climate justice: An emerging research agenda

Calls for climate justice abound as evidence accumulates of the growing social and environmental injustices aggravated or driven by climate change. There is now a considerable and diverse literature

Climate justice for the southwestern coastal region of Bangladesh

Climate change is considered a moral, ethical and social issue, which makes it different from other developmental issues. The foremost instance of lack of justice regarding climate change is that the

Climate change-induced migration: a bibliometric review

The trend shows a transition from concepts such as vulnerability, climate change, land degradation, refugees and security to others such as concept such as international migration, climate justice, sustainability, human rights and disaster risk reduction.



A Rights Turn in Climate Change Litigation?

Abstract In 2015, a Pakistani court in the case of Leghari v. Federation of Pakistan made history by accepting arguments that governmental failures to address climate change adequately violated

Climate justice and the international regime: before, during, and after Paris

With a focus on key themes and debates, this article aims to illustrate and assess how the interaction between justice and politics has shaped the international regime and defined the nature of the

Lacking Rights and Justice in a Burning World: The Case for Granting Standing to Future Generations in Climate Change Litigation

The exacerbation of climate change effects has rendered the legal adaptation of granting future generations standing in climate change litigation, necessary to achieve intergenerational justice and

Climate change litigation: A review of research on courts and litigants in climate governance

Studies of climate change litigation have proliferated over the past two decades, as lawsuits across the world increasingly bring policy debates about climate change mitigation and adaptation, as

Situating Urgenda v the Netherlands within comparative climate change litigation

This article situates the judgment of The Hague District Court in Urgenda Foundation v the Kingdom of the Netherlands within the life of global climate change litigation. To do so, the article

Broadening the scope of loss and damage to legal liability: an experiment

ABSTRACT The 2015 Paris Agreement represents a historic deal in the form of a strong international response to address climate change. This outcome came as a surprise for some, as several

The Unsexy Future of Climate Change Litigation

This article starts the task of expanding the concept of climate change litigation. It argues that a preoccupation with high-profile cases, can divert attention from other important issues litigated

The comparative politics of courts and climate change

Disappointment with international efforts to find legal solutions to climate change has led to the emergence of a new generation of climate policy. This includes the emergence of courts as new

An initial scoping of transitional justice for global climate governance

ABSTRACT Geopolitical changes combined with the increasing urgency of ambitious climate action have re-opened debates about justice and international climate policy. Tensions about historical

A climate change litigation precedent: Urgenda Foundation v The State of the Netherlands†

On 24 June 2015, The Hague District Court rendered a historic judgment in the climate case of Urgenda Foundation v The State of the Netherlands. The ruling marks the first successful climate change