Clear as Black and White: The Effects of Ambiguous Rhetoric Depend on Candidate Race

@article{Piston2018ClearAB,
  title={Clear as Black and White: The Effects of Ambiguous Rhetoric Depend on Candidate Race},
  author={Spencer Piston and Yanna Krupnikov and John Barry Ryan and Kerri Milita},
  journal={The Journal of Politics},
  year={2018},
  volume={80},
  pages={662 - 674}
}
Campaign advisors and political scientists have long acknowledged the benefits of ambiguous position taking. We argue, however, that these benefits do not extend to black candidates facing nonblack voters. When a white candidate makes vague statements, many of these voters project their own policy positions onto the candidate, increasing support for the candidate. But they are less likely to extend black candidates the same courtesy. We test these claims with an original two-wave survey… 
Ambiguous Rhetoric and Legislative Accountability
Work on candidate positioning suggests that ambiguous statements help candidates by broadening their appeal and providing leeway to take different positions once in office. While experimental
The Effect of Associative Racial Cues in Elections
ABSTRACT How do racial signals associating a candidate with minority supporters change voters’ perceptions about a candidate and their support for a candidate? Given the presence of competing
“I Didn’t Lie, I Misspoke”: Voters’ Responses to Questionable Campaign Claims
Abstract Lies and half-truths are commonplace in US politics. While there is a growing literature examining questionable statements, relatively little attention has been given to the consequences
Medicare for All, Some, or None? Testing the Effects of Ambiguity in the Context of the 2020 Presidential Election
ABSTRACT Political scientists have long contemplated whether candidates are better off taking more ambiguous policy positions. Taking advantage of a lack of clarity in Senator Kamala Harris’s
Disfavor or Favor? Assessing the Valence of White Americans' Racial Attitudes
When citizens' racial attitudes are associated with their judgments related to race---for example, when people with more negative attitudes toward Blacks are less likely to vote for a Black political
Rebuttals as deracializing strategies for African American and white candidates
EDUCATION Princeton University, Princeton, NJ Ph.D., Politics and Social Policy, expected May 2016 Dissertation: “How Candidates Overcome Negative Racial Campaigns in American Politics” Committee:
The intersectional politics of bullshit
The “Politics of bullshit” (Hopkin and Rosamond, 2017) is the practice of rhetoric that communicates falsehoods, with little regard for the truth, and Hopkin and Rosamond have argued “the rise of
A Gendered Information Gap
  • The Qualifications Gap
  • 2020
...
1
2
3
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 92 REFERENCES
How Explicit Racial Prejudice Hurt Obama in the 2008 Election
Some commentators claim that white Americans put prejudice behind them when evaluating presidential candidates in 2008. Previous research examining whether white racism hurts black candidates has
Political Ideology, Skin Tone, and the Psychology of Candidate Evaluations
In this paper, we examine the role of political ideology in shaping black voters’ evaluations of political candidates’ race and skin tone. Our findings challenge simplistic notions of black
Accentuating the Negative: Candidate Race and Campaign Strategy
This article examines the impact of candidate race and campaign negativity on candidate evaluations and turnout. Unlike previous research, we argue that candidate race and campaign negativity should
Black Incumbents, White Districts
This article explores the controversial 1996 success of three African American incumbents (Sanford Bishop and Cynthia McKinney of Georgia and Corrine Brown of Florida) who lost their majority-Black
White Voters and African American Candidates for Congress
The vast majority of African American officeholders are elected from jurisdictions with sizable numbers of African Americans. The most common explanation for this phenomenon locates the cause among
The Electoral Implications of Candidate Ambiguity
Candidates often make ambiguous statements about the policies they intend to pursue. In theory, ambiguity affects how voters make choices and who wins elections. In practice, measurement and
Change or More of The Same? Evaluating Racial Attitudes in the Obama Era
A number of political commentators and social scientists have speculated about the implications of the election of Barack Obama for race relations. Some of the more optimistic have suggested that the
One of Our Own: Black Female Candidates and The Voters Who Support Them
While the number of African-American elected officials has increased over the last four decades, Blacks remain underrepresented at all levels of government. Even more striking is the relatively small
Nothing to Hide, Nowhere to Run, or Nothing to Lose: Candidate Position-Taking in Congressional Elections
If candidates do not state clear issue positions, then voters cannot anticipate how the candidates will govern if elected nor hold candidates accountable for breaking campaign pledges. Yet, previous
...
1
2
3
4
5
...