Clarifying Costs: Can Increased Price Transparency Reduce Healthcare Spending?
@article{Muir2013ClarifyingCC, title={Clarifying Costs: Can Increased Price Transparency Reduce Healthcare Spending?}, author={M. Muir and Stephanie A. Alessi and J. King}, journal={UC Hastings College of the Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series}, year={2013} }
As healthcare expenditures continue to climb, politicians, business leaders, and patients avidly search for new methods to reduce healthcare costs. In an eleven-point plan released this summer, a group of the nation’s top healthcare experts listed “full transparency of prices” as one potential solution to reduce healthcare costs. The experts, some of whom helped write the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, argued that price transparency would allow consumers to compare prices before… CONTINUE READING
15 Citations
The Only Prescription is Transparency: The Effect of Charge-Price-Transparency Regulation on Healthcare Prices
- Business
- 2019
- 14
The Secret Menu in Health Care: A Cash Market for Imaging in California
- Business, Medicine
- Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
- 2020
National estimates of price variation by site of care.
- Medicine
- The American journal of managed care
- 2016
- 15
- PDF
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 29 REFERENCES
Using Antitrust Law to Increase Efficiency in the Healthcare Market
- 2013
11-791, 15 HEALTH CARE PRICE TRANSPARENCY: MEANINGFUL PRICE INFORMATION IS DIFFICULT FOR CONSUMERS TO OBTAIN PRIOR TO RECEIVING CARE
- 2011
The Consequences of Secret Prices: The Politics of Physician Preference Items, 27 HEALTH AFF
- 2008
Intermountain Health Care Inc., 461 F.3d 1249
- 2006
Section Two of the Sherman Act deals with single-firm monopolies, see 15 U.S.C. § 2, but, importantly, a monopoly is not unlawful if it was acquired by "skill, foresight and industry
- 148 F.2d
- 1993
Hospital Corporation of America
- 1985
and] buyers are forced to forego their free choice between competing products
- N. Pac. Ry. Co. v
- 1958
It is crucial that there be two parties, because a single party cannot make an unlawful agreement with itself
- 1919