Citizen endorsement of contested peace settlements: public opinion in post-Dayton Bosnia

  title={Citizen endorsement of contested peace settlements: public opinion in post-Dayton Bosnia},
  author={Edward Morgan-Jones and Djordje Stefanovic and Neophytos Loizides},
  pages={434 - 452}
ABSTRACT This article asks what shapes public support for comprehensive peace agreements that aim to end violent conflict in deeply divided societies. Although public perceptions are critical for the success of territorial settlements, little scholarly attention has focused on citizen attitudes towards peace in the post-implementation phase. We develop and empirically test a theory of citizen support for peace agreements that relates power-sharing institutions to broader citizens’ security… 
Civil Society in Peace Referendums: Inclusion and Campaign Mobilization in Northern Ireland and Cyprus
Abstract This article asks whether civil society’s inclusion/exclusion in peace negotiations shapes their involvement in peace agreement referendum campaigns. It seeks to answer this question through
Protests in Postwar Societies: Grievances and Contentious Collective Action in Kosovo
Most research on protests has been conducted in peaceful societies, whereas we know far less about contentious collective action in postwar contexts. To fill this gap, we offer a theory that


Peacebuilding and consociational electoral engineering in bosnia and herzegovina
What role do elections play in societies emerging from communal war and what type of institutions can serve as catalysts in deepening peace and compromise? While some analysts argue that ethnicity
A People’s Peace in Cyprus: Testing Public Opinion on the Options for a Comprehensive Settlement
The year 2009 may well be a make-or-break year for the protracted Cyprus conflict. While strategic assessments and elite incentives bode cautiously well for a settlement, ultimately an agreement will
Letting “the people(s)” decide: peace referendums and power-sharing settlements
ABSTRACT Referendums have been used to legitimate power-sharing settlements in deeply divided societies transitioning from conflict. This article assesses the capacity of referendum rules to
Institutionalizing Peace: Power Sharing and Post-Civil War Conflict Management
This article examines how power-sharing institutions might best be designed to stabilize the transition to enduring peace among former adversaries following the negotiated settlement of civil wars.
Escaping the Symbolic Politics Trap: Reconciliation Initiatives and Conflict Resolution in Ethnic Wars
Existing approaches to resolving civil wars are based primarily on the assumption that these wars result from conflicts of interest among rational individuals. However, peacebuilding efforts based on
Good Fences Make Good Neighbours: Assessing the Role of Consociational Politics in Transitional Justice
This chapter reflects upon the relationship of transitional justice (TJ) theory and practice and consociational theory and practice to transitional solutions in deeply divided ethnic polities. We
Bosnia-Herzegovina Ten Years after Dayton: Constitutional Change and Public Opinion
Two American-based political geographers and the head of a Bosnian public opinion research organization present and discuss the results of public opinion polls related to the tenth anniversary of the
From Abstentionism to Enthusiasm: Sinn Féin, Nationalist Electors and Support for Devolved Power-sharing in Northern Ireland
The Northern Ireland peace process saw remarkable change in the policies of Sinn Féin. Having pledged to end Northern Ireland as a political entity, Sinn Féin accepted the 1998 Good Friday Agreement
A Closer Look at the Limits of Consociationalism
  • M. Wilson
  • Sociology
    Comparative Political Studies
  • 2019
Although scholars agree that ethnically divided societies are generally more prone to political violence, critics of consociationalism suggest that proportional representation and parliamentarism
Political Elites and Democratic State-building Efforts in Bosnia and Iraq
This article explores the underlying theories of political change that have informed the internationally-led state-building efforts in Bosnia and Iraq. Despite their disparate origins and goals,