Citing for High Impact

Abstract

The question of citation behavior has always intrigued scientists from various disciplines. While general citation patterns have been widely studied in the literature we develop the notion of citation projection graphs by investigating the citations among the publications that a given paper cites. We investigate how patterns of citations vary between various scientific disciplines and how such patterns reflect the scientific impact of the paper. We find that idiosyncratic citation patterns are characteristic for low impact papers; while narrow, discipline-focused citation patterns are common for medium impact papers. Our results show that crossing-community, or bridging citation patters are high risk and high reward since such patterns are characteristic for both low and high impact papers. Last, we observe that recently citation networks are trending toward more bridging and interdisciplinary forms.

DOI: 10.1145/1816123.1816131

Extracted Key Phrases

7 Figures and Tables

0102020102011201220132014201520162017
Citations per Year

68 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 68 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@inproceedings{Shi2010CitingFH, title={Citing for High Impact}, author={Xiaolin Shi and Jure Leskovec and Daniel A. McFarland}, booktitle={JCDL}, year={2010} }