Citation analysis: The counting house

  title={Citation analysis: The counting house},
  author={David Adam},
  • D. Adam
  • Published 14 February 2002
  • Education
  • Nature
Scientists' work is often evaluated using citation statistics compiled by a company called the ISI. But how useful and reliable are the data? David Adam gets the measure of citation analysis. 
Counting on citations: a flawed way to measure quality
A system is introduced, which may be easily replicated, to identify the best articles published in a journal to improve the quality of scientific research.
Comments on a critique of the Thomson Reuters journal impact factor
We discuss research evaluation, the nature of impact, and the use of the Thomson Reuters journal impact factor and other indicators in scientometrics in the light of recent commentary.
What's Wrong with Citation Counts?
It is argued that a new approach based on the collection of citation data at the time the papers are created can overcome current limitations, and a new framework in which the research community is the owner of a Global Citation Registry characterized by high quality citation data handled automatically is proposed.
Impact of Wikipedia on citation trends
It is shown that although citation counts generally increase during time, the citation “propensity” does not increase after inclusion of a reference in Wikipedia.
It is shown that although citation counts generally increase during time, the citation “propensity” does not increase after inclusion of a reference in Wikipedia.
The top 100 most cited articles in rosacea: a bibliometric analysis
Many articles in rosacea have been published. Bibliometric analysis is helpful to determine the most influential studies in a specific field.
The Social Construction Of Bibliometric Evaluations
While national systems of research evaluation vary in many dimensions, they all need to rely on very few methods of evaluating research performance. These methods constitute a crucial interface


Improving the accuracy of Institute for Scientific Information's journal impact factors
Evidence is presented that for a considerable number of journals the values of the impact factors published in ISI's Journal Citation Reports (JCR) are inaccurate, particularly for several journals having a high impact factor.
Sense and nonsense of science citation analyses: comments on the monopoly position of ISI and citation inaccuracies. Risks of possible misuse and biased citation and impact data.
Journal editors and publishers, authors of scientific papers, research directors, university and research council administrators, and even government officials increasingly make use of so-called
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
Alternative methods for evaluating research are being sought, such as citation rates and journal impact factors, which seem to be quantitative and objective indicators directly related to published science.
Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome.
The results of an international collaboration to produce and make freely available a draft sequence of the human genome are reported and an initial analysis is presented, describing some of the insights that can be gleaned from the sequence.