Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: an updated review and user survey

Abstract

BACKGROUND A COS represents an agreed minimum set of outcomes that should be measured and reported in all trials of a specific condition. The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) initiative aims to collate and stimulate the development and application of COS, by including data on relevant studies within a publically available internet-based… (More)
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146444

Topics

7 Figures and Tables

Statistics

0102020162017
Citations per Year

Citation Velocity: 12

Averaging 12 citations per year over the last 2 years.

Learn more about how we calculate this metric in our FAQ.

Cite this paper

@inproceedings{Gorst2015ChoosingIH, title={Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: an updated review and user survey}, author={Sarah L. Gorst and Elizabeth Gargon and Paula R Williamson}, booktitle={PloS one}, year={2015} }