Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance.

@article{Baumeister1984ChokingUP,
  title={Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance.},
  author={R. Baumeister},
  journal={Journal of personality and social psychology},
  year={1984},
  volume={46 3},
  pages={
          610-20
        }
}
  • R. Baumeister
  • Published 1984
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Journal of personality and social psychology
Choking under pressure is defined as performance decrements under circumstances that increase the importance of good or improved performance. A model for choking on coordination and skill tasks is proposed, holding that the pressure increases the conscious attention to the performer's own process of performance and that this increased conscious attention disrupts the automatic or overlearned nature of the execution. Six experiments provided data consistent with this model. Three studies showed… Expand
View on PubMed
doi.org
1,320 Citations
Highly Influential Citations
181
Background Citations
695
Methods Citations
63
Results Citations
63

Topics from this paper

    1,320 Citations

    Citation Type

    Citation Type

    A review of paradoxical performance effects: Choking under pressure in sports and mental tests
    Paradoxical performance effects (‘choking under pressure’) are defined as the occurrence of inferior performance despite striving and incentives for superior performance. Experimental demonstrations… Expand
    Attentional Processes and Choking under Pressure
    TLDR
    The findings suggest that attentional shifts during choking can be related to specific aspects of movement execution, which are important in conscious movement control before execution becomes automated through practice. Expand
    Choking under pressure: the neuropsychological mechanisms of incentive-induced performance decrements
    • Rongjun Yu
    • Psychology, Medicine
    • Front. Behav. Neurosci.
    • 2015
    TLDR
    This review aims to identify psychological factors that determine choking and the neural underpinnings of these processes, and insights into how incentives influence performance may aid engineering training regimens and interventions that equip individuals to better handle high-stakes-induced psychological stress, and to thrive under stress. Expand
    Thinking about Choking? Attentional Processes and Paradoxical Performance
    TLDR
    Results show that pressure caused choking when participants were not distracted and had not been adapted to self awareness and this effect was attenuated when cognitive load was increased or when self-awareness adaptation had occurred. Expand
    Self-Consciousness and Performance Decrements Within a Sporting Context
    TLDR
    Baumeister’s (1984) predicted negative correlation between self-consciousness and choking in the context of basketball free-throw shooting is tested, which indicates that training performance was superior to competition performance (i.e., that choking Occurred). Expand
    Limiting motor skill knowledge via incidental training protects against choking under pressure
    TLDR
    It is shown that only participants who train and perform with premovement cues that allowed for preparatory movement planning choke under pressure due to large monetary incentives, and that this effect is independent of the level of skill attained. Expand
    On the fragility of skilled performance: what governs choking under pressure?
    • S. Beilock, T. Carr
    • Psychology, Medicine
    • Journal of experimental psychology. General
    • 2001
    TLDR
    Findings support explicit monitoring theories of choking and the popular but infrequently tested belief that attending to proceduralized skills hurts performance. Expand
    Choking under pressure: multiple routes to skill failure.
    TLDR
    The authors propose that aspects of the pressure situation itself can lead to distraction and/or explicit monitoring, differentially harming skills that rely more or less on working memory and attentional control. Expand
    Self-Consciousness, Self-presentation, and Performance Under Pressure: Who Chokes, and When?
    Choking under pressure by persons low and high in self-consciousness was examined as a function of two sources of performance pressure: audience and performance feedback. Subjects competed with an… Expand
    Choking on the Money
    TLDR
    Conurrent functional magnetic resonance imaging revealed that increased activity in ventral midbrain, a brain area associated with incentive motivation and basic reward responding, correlated with both reduced number of captures and increased number of near-misses associated with imminent high rewards. Expand
    ...
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    ...

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 25 REFERENCES
    Competition in Motor Performance: An Experimental Analysis of Motivational Components.
    Abstract From a review of the literature, three components—rivalry, coaction, and audience—were hypothesized to jointly constitute the overall motivational effects of competition. The various… Expand
    When practice makes imperfect: debilitating effects of overlearning.
    It was hypothesized that as overlearning leads to "mindlessness," the individual components of a task become relatively inaccessible to consciousness and therefore unavailable to serve as evidence of… Expand
    Competition of internal and external information in an exercise setting.
    TLDR
    Two experiments examined when attention to external cues attenuates the perception of physical symptoms and fatigue during physical exercise, and found that subjects hearing distracting sounds reported less fatigue and fewer symptoms than subjects hearing an amplification of their own breathing. Expand
    Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory.
    A scale was constructed to assess individual differences in self-consciou sness. Norms and test-retest reliability are presented. Factor analysis of the scale revealed that self-consciousness has… Expand
    Test anxiety and direction of attention.
    • J. Wine
    • Psychology, Medicine
    • Psychological bulletin
    • 1971
    TLDR
    The literature reviewed suggests an attentional interpretation, of the adverse effects which test anxiety has on task performance, that highly anxious persons are generally more self-preoccupied than are people low in anxiety. Expand
    Evaluation potential as a determinant of coaction effects
    Abstract Two purposes of the study were: (a) to test the hypothesis that increasing number of coactors result in increasing impairment in motor performance; and (b) to determine what component(s) of… Expand
    Test anxiety, stress, and social support
    Abstract : Three experiments were carried out dealing with the relationships among test anxiety, stress, and social support. In the first experiment, social support was defined in terms of the… Expand
    Escape and Avoidance Conditioning in Human Subjects without Their Observation of the Response
    An invisibly small thumb-twitch increased in rate of occurrence when it served, via electromyographic amplification, to terminate or postpone aversive noise stimulation. Subjects remained ignorant of… Expand
    Pygmalion and galatea: The interactive effect of teacher and student expectancies
    An experiment was conducted to examine the effect of the manipulation of both teacher and student expectancies upon performance. Subjects were students from 6–8th grades participating in a summer… Expand
    The effect of spectator presence on gymnastic performance in a field situation
    The effect of spectator presence on gymnastic performance was examined in a series of studies. It was found that spectator presence led to a significant decrement in quality of gymnastic performance… Expand
    ...
    1
    2
    3
    ...