Corpus ID: 208335150

Chauvet Cave rock art by ‘Neanderthals’

@inproceedings{Bednarik2019ChauvetCR,
  title={Chauvet Cave rock art by ‘Neanderthals’},
  author={R. Bednarik},
  year={2019}
}
The attribution of the rock art in Chauvet Cave to the Aurignacian and the challenges to its dating are reviewed. Similarly, the dominant view that the palaeoart of the Early Upper Palaeolithic technological traditions is generally the work of invading modern humans is tested against the lack of evidence of the presence of such hominins. Even the need to account for the physical changes of hominins towards the end of the Late Pleistocene by a replacement hypothesis is refuted. It is contended… Expand

Figures from this paper

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 84 REFERENCES
Pleistocene Palaeoart of the Americas
In contrast to the great time depth of Pleistocene rock art and mobiliary ‘art’ in the four other continents, the available evidence from the Americas is very limited, and restricted at best to theExpand
The Mythical Moderns
Based on the most current information available on the Late Pleistocene palaeoanthropology of Europe, this paper presents a revolutionary reassessment of the dominant models. The notions of anExpand
Pleistocene Palaeoart of Africa
This comprehensive review of all currently known Pleistocene rock art of Africa shows that the majority of sites are located in the continent's south, but that the petroglyphs at some of them are ofExpand
Seafaring in the Pleistocene
Archaeological data from Wallacea (Indonesia) and elsewhere are summarized to show that the history of seafaring begins in the Early Pleistocene, and that this human capability eventually led toExpand
Pleistocene Paleoart of Australia
TLDR
The current evidence suggests that figurative depiction was introduced only during the Holocene, never reaching Tasmania, and any heavily weathered or patinated petroglyphs on particularly hard rocks are good candidates for Pleistocene antiquity. Expand
The Domestication of Humans
TLDR
The rapid gracilization of all humans of the Final Pleistocene is attributed here to suspension of natural evolutionary developments by culturally mediated breeding patterns favouring skeletal gracility. Expand
Palaeoart and Archaeological Myths
This article addresses the question of human symbolic behaviour in the Lower and Middle Palaeolithic. Bednarik argues that the case against such early symbolic behaviour usually relies on untestableExpand
Pleistocene Paleoart of Europe
TLDR
The European paleoart demonstrates that the teleological model of cultural “evolution” is false, which is to be expected because evolution is purely dysteleological. Expand
Direct dating of Early Upper Palaeolithic human remains from Mladeč
TLDR
The first successful direct accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon dating of five representative human fossils from the Mladeč Caves is presented, confirming that this fossil assemblage is the oldest cranial, dental and postcranial assemblages of early modern humans in Europe and is therefore central to discussions of modern human emergence in the northwestern Old World and the fate of the Neanderthals. Expand
Pleistocene Palaeoart of Asia
This comprehensive overview considers the currently known Pleistocene palaeoart of Asia on a common basis, which suggests that the available data are entirely inadequate to form any cohesiveExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...