Characterizing References from Different Disciplines: A Perspective of Citation Content Analysis

@article{Zhang2021CharacterizingRF,
  title={Characterizing References from Different Disciplines: A Perspective of Citation Content Analysis},
  author={Chengzhi Zhang and Lifan Liu and Yuzhuo Wang},
  journal={J. Informetrics},
  year={2021},
  volume={15},
  pages={101134}
}
Abstract Multidisciplinary cooperation is now common in research since social issues inevitably involve multiple disciplines. In research articles, reference information, especially citation content, is an important representation of communication among different disciplines. Analyzing the distribution characteristics of references from different disciplines in research articles is basic to detecting the sources of referred information and identifying contributions of different disciplines… Expand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 44 REFERENCES
The distribution of references across texts: Some implications for citation analysis
TLDR
Counting the number of times a bibliographic reference is cited in a paper rather than treating all references the same no matter how many times they are invoked in the citing article reveals the differential contributions made by the cited works to the citing paper. Expand
Content‐based citation analysis: The next generation of citation analysis
TLDR
This paper provides a comprehensive overview of CAA research in terms of its theoretical foundations, methodical approaches, and example applications, and highlights how increased computational capabilities and publicly available full‐text resources have opened this area of research to vast possibilities. Expand
Examining similarities and differences of citation patterns between monographs and papers: a case in biology and computer science
TLDR
The results indicate that between monographs and papers, differences are shown in location, length of citation content and year, source of reference, whereas frequency of mention of reference is similar. Expand
Characterizing in-text citations in scientific articles: A large-scale analysis
TLDR
Characteristics of in-text citations in over five million full text articles from two large databases are analyzed as functions of time, textual progression, and scientific field to find that there are large field-level differences that are reflected in position within the text, citation interval, and citation counts of references. Expand
The invariant distribution of references in scientific articles
TLDR
Using the full text of 45,000 papers published in the PLoS series of journals as a case study, this paper investigates how references are distributed along the structure of scientific papers as well as the age of these cited references. Expand
Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact
TLDR
It is shown that the probability that an article is cited c times has large variations between different disciplines, but all distributions are rescaled on a universal curve when the relative indicator cf = c/c0 is considered, where c0 is the average number of citations per article for the discipline. Expand
Analyzing knowledge flows of scientific literature through semantic links: a case study in the field of energy
TLDR
A new technique to semantically analyze knowledge flows across countries by using publication and citation data is proposed, which indicates that Japanese researchers focus in the research areas such as efficient use of Photovoltaic, Energy Conversion and Superconductors (to produce low-cost renewable energy). Expand
Should Citations be Counted Separately from Each Originating Section
TLDR
Section headings are partly unreliable indicators of citation context and may still be used within fields to help identify individual highly cited articles that have had one type of impact, especially methodological or context setting, but expert judgement is needed to validate the results. Expand
WL‐index: Leveraging citation mention number to quantify an individual's scientific impact
TLDR
The h‐index is revised and a new bibliometric index, the WL‐index, is proposed to evaluation an individual's scientific impact, which more accurately discriminates between program committee chairs of reputable conferences and ordinary authors. Expand
Reference density trends in the major disciplines
TLDR
This study found that mean reference density values in some Social Sciences and Arts and Humanities categories were equal to or higher than those in the “hard sciences” and this can be considered an indication that citation-based evaluation practices affect publication habits. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...