Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites.

@article{Beun2007CharacterizationON,
  title={Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites.},
  author={S{\'e}bastien Beun and Th{\'e}r{\`e}se Glorieux and Jacques Devaux and Jos{\'e} Vreven and G. Leloup},
  journal={Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials},
  year={2007},
  volume={23 1},
  pages={51-9}
}
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to compare the inorganic fraction and the mechanical properties of three nanofilled composites with four universal hybrid and two microfilled composites. The degrees of conversion of the materials photopolymerized using halogen and LED units were also investigated. METHODS Three nanofilled (Supreme, Grandio and Grandio Flow), four universal hybrid (Point-4, Tetric Ceram, Venus, Z 100) and two microfilled (A 110, Durafill VS) composites were used in… CONTINUE READING
Related Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 1 time. VIEW TWEETS

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 120 extracted citations

Impact of Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Nanocomposites.

The journal of contemporary dental practice • 2017
View 3 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…