Characteristics of Retracted Articles Based on Retraction Data From Online Sources Through February 2019

  title={Characteristics of Retracted Articles Based on Retraction Data From Online Sources Through February 2019},
  author={Quan‐Hoang Vuong and Viet-Phuong La and Tung Manh Ho and Thu-Trang Vuong and Toan Manh Ho},
  journal={Political Economy - Development: Domestic Development Strategies eJournal},
  • Q. Vuong, Viet-Phuong La, +2 authors Toan Manh Ho
  • Published 20 February 2020
  • Political Science
  • Political Economy - Development: Domestic Development Strategies eJournal
Purpose:Although retractions are commonly considered to be negative, the fact remains that they play a positive role in the academic community. For instance, retractions help scientific enterprise perform its self-correcting function and provide lessons for future researchers; furthermore, they represent the fulfillment of social responsibilities, and they enable scientific communities to offer better monitoring services to keep problematic studies in check. This study aims to provide a… Expand
6 Citations
Can tweets be used to detect problems early with scientific papers? A case study of three retracted COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 papers
This case study analyzed tweet texts of three retracted publications about COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019)/SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) and their retraction notices and found early warning signs in tweet texts regarding one publication. Expand
Research ethics: a profile of retractions from world class universities
This study aims to profile the scientific retractions published in journals indexed in the Web of Science database from 2010 to 2019, from researchers at the top 20 World Class Universities accordingExpand
Comprehensive Analysis of Retracted Publications in Dentistry: A 23-Year Review
It was revealed that maximum retractions of dentistry-related research originated from India and Spain and, on average, took 2.6 years to be issued a retraction notice, and there was a trend for lower impact factor-dental journals in retracting maximum articles. Expand
Crossing the 100-publication milestone to celebrate the new year 2021
  • N. Huyen, Minh-Hoang Nguyen, Manh-Toan Ho
  • 2021
As the year 2021 has just begun, it is time for us to look back to see what we have achieved so far. Last year, the year of 2020, marked a special event for the Center for Interdisciplinary SocialExpand
Data Fraud and Essence of Data Verifiability


A Comprehensive Analysis of Articles Retracted Between 2004 and 2013 from Biomedical Literature – A Call for Reforms
It is concluded that although retraction of articles is a rare event, its constant rise in scientific literature is quite worrisome and it is still unclear whether misconduct/mistakes in articles are increasing hastily or the articles are retracted at a rapid rate in recent times. Expand
Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008
Journals' retraction practices are not uniform and some retractions fail to state the reason, and therefore fail to distinguish error from misconduct, which is used to inform guidelines on retractions. Expand
Retractions covered by Retraction Watch in the 2013–2015 period: prevalence for the most productive countries
There is no consistent pattern for the relationship between ranking in SJR and ranking in number of retractions across countries in the authors' RW dataset, which is skewed mostly by the fact that the RW website tends to post newsworthy retractions, with a bias toward biomedical and clinical sciences. Expand
Post retraction citations in context: a case study
The results show that the vast majority of citations to retracted articles are positive despite of the clear retraction notice on the publisher’s platform and regardless of the reason for retraction. Expand
Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?
Lower barriers to publication of flawed articles are seen in the increase in number and proportion of retractions by authors with a single retraction and an increase in retraction for “new” offenses such as plagiarism and a decrease in the time-to-retraction of flawed work. Expand
Empirical developments in retraction
Current data on key questions about retraction of scientific articles suggest that editors and institutional officials are taking more responsibility for correcting the scientific record but that reasons published in the retraction notice are not always reliable. Expand
Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview
The characteristics of papers retracted due to a faked peer review, which primarily included publisher, journal, journal impact factor, country, as well as publication and retraction year, were reviewed. Expand
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
It is suggested that abandoning journals altogether, in favor of a library-based scholarly communication system, will ultimately be necessary because this new system will use modern information technology to vastly improve the filter, sort and discovery functions of the current journal system. Expand
Retracted Science and the Retraction Index
Using a novel measure that is called the “retraction index,” it is found that the frequency of retraction varies among journals and shows a strong correlation with the journal impact factor. Expand
Retractions of scientific publications: responsibility and accountability
  • V. Katavic
  • Political Science, Medicine
  • Biochemia medica
  • 2014
This evidence-based opinion piece gives a short overview of the increase in retractions of publications in scientific journals and discusses various reasons for that increase. Also discussed are someExpand