Changing patterns of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor use in 9074 patients with rheumatoid arthritis.


OBJECTIVE Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) commonly switch between tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors after failing to control disease activity. Much of the clinical data that support switching to a second TNF agent when one agent fails to work has come from small, short-term studies. We utilized a US insurance claims database to determine patterns of use such as dose escalation, time to discontinuation, and switching between TNF inhibitors in patients with RA. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed using an insurance claims database in the US from 2000 to 2005. TNF inhibitor use, time to switch, dose escalation, and continuation times were analyzed in patients with RA. RESULTS Nine thousand seventy-four patients with RA started TNF inhibitors during the period 2000 to 2005. Etanercept was the most commonly used TNF inhibitor; infliximab had the highest duration of continuation, about 50% at 2 years. In addition, infliximab showed higher rates of dose escalation compared to etanercept and adalimumab. For all TNF inhibitors, time to switching decreased from 2000 to 2005. CONCLUSION TNF inhibitor use patterns changed from 2000 to 2005, with more frequent changes among the different TNF inhibitors and a shorter duration of treatment before the change. Only about 50% of TNF inhibitors are still continued at 2 years, reflecting the difference between randomized clinical trials and real-world experience.

DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.080592
Citations per Year

248 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 248 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Yazici2009ChangingPO, title={Changing patterns of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor use in 9074 patients with rheumatoid arthritis.}, author={Yusuf Yazici and Svetlana Krasnokutsky and Jaime Barnes and Patricia L Hines and Jason G. Rui Wang and Lisa C. Rosenblatt}, journal={The Journal of rheumatology}, year={2009}, volume={36 5}, pages={907-13} }