• DOI:10.1016/j.cellbi.2004.06.006
Corpus ID: 30633352

Chance and necessity do not explain the origin of life

@article{Trevors2004ChanceAN,
  title={Chance and necessity do not explain the origin of life},
  author={J. T. Trevors and David Abel},
  journal={Cell Biology International},
  year={2004},
  volume={28}
}

• J. Trevors, D. Abel
• Published 1 November 2004
• Biology, Medicine
• Cell Biology International

Where and how did the complex genetic instruction set programmed into DNA come into existence? The genetic set may have arisen elsewhere and was transported to the Earth. If not, it arose on the Earth, and became the genetic code in a previous lifeless, physical—chemical world. Even if RNA or DNA were inserted into a lifeless world, they would not contain any genetic instructions unless each nucleotide selection in the sequence was programmed for function. Even then, a predetermined communication system would have had to be in place for any message to be understood at the destination. Transcription and translation would not necessarily have been needed in an RNA world. Ribozymes could have accomplished some of the simpler functions of current protein enzymes. Templating of single RNA strands followed by retemplating back to a sense strand could have occurred. But this process does not explain the derivation of “sense” in any strand. “Sense” means algorithmic function achieved through sequences of certain decision‐node switch‐settings. These particular primary structures determine secondary and tertiary structures. Each sequence determines minimum‐free‐energy folding propensities, binding site specificity, and function. Minimal metabolism would be needed for cells to be capable of growth and division. All known metabolism is cybernetic—that is, it is programmatically and algorithmically organized and controlled.