• Corpus ID: 672453

Challenging some common beliefs: Empirical work within the adaptive toolbox metaphor

  title={Challenging some common beliefs: Empirical work within the adaptive toolbox metaphor},
  author={Arndt Br{\"o}der and Ben R. Newell},
  journal={Judgment and Decision Making},
The authors review their own empirical work inspired by the adaptive toolbox metaphor. The review examines factors influencing strategy selection and execution in multi-attribute inference tasks (e.g., information costs, time pressure, memory retrieval, dynamic environments, stimulus formats, intelligence). An emergent theme is the re-evaluation of contingency model claims about the elevated cognitive costs of compensatory in comparison with non-compensatory strategies. Contrary to common… 

Figures from this paper

Toolbox or adjustable spanner? A critical comparison of two metaphors for adaptive decision making.
For the majority of participants, their stopping behavior is well captured by the notion of an evidence threshold that is either undercut or passed by the given evidence.
Judgment: a cognitive processing perspective.
It is argued that systematic contingencies in strategy use can be understood as adaptive responses to costs in learning, information acquisition, and strategy execution.
Empirical comparison of the adjustable spanner and the adaptive toolbox models of choice.
Empirically testable implementations of two prominent competing theoretical frameworks are developed and compared across two multiattribute choice experiments: the adaptive toolbox framework assuming discrete choice strategies and the adjustable spanner framework assuming one comprehensive adaptive strategy.
Cognitive niches: an ecological model of strategy selection.
A quantitative model is proposed that predicts how selection emerges through the interplay among strategies, cognitive capacities, and the environment and specifies when people will be able to apply different strategies and how accurate, fast, and effortless people's decisions will be.
Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles.
This work provides convergent arguments and evidence for a unified theoretical approach to both intuitive and deliberative judgments, and adumbrates a unified approach that specifies the critical dimensions on which judgmental situations may vary and the environmental conditions under which rules can be expected to be successful.
Meta-Reasoning : Shedding metacognitive light on reasoning research
In this chapter, we argue that understanding the processes that underlie reasoning, problem solving, and decision-making can be informed by understanding the metacognitive processes that monitor and
Selecting decision strategies: The differential role of affect
Results indicate that mood influenced the use of decision strategies and indicate that gaining a deeper theoretical understanding of the cognitive mechanisms that govern decision processes requires taking emotions into account.
Heuristic decision making.
Research indicates that individuals and organizations often rely on simple heuristics in an adaptive way, and ignoring part of the information can lead to more accurate judgments than weighting and adding all information, for instance for low predictability and small samples.
Fluent, fast, and frugal? A formal model evaluation of the interplay between memory, fluency, and comparative judgments.
A measurement model from the class of multinomial processing tree models is proposed that can estimate true single-cue reliance on recognition and retrieval fluency and reveals that the fluency heuristic is an unlikely candidate for describing comparative judgments concerning recognized objects.


Cognitive processes, models and metaphors in decision research
This special issue encourages cross-fertilization between cognitive psychology and decision research by providing an overview of current perspectives in one area that continues to highlight the benefits of the synergistic approach: cognitive modeling of multi-attribute decision making.
Heuristic and linear models of judgment: matching rules and environments.
The authors use statistical tools to model how the performance of heuristic rules varies as a function of environmental characteristics and highlight the trade-off between using linear models and heuristics.
Decision making with the "adaptive toolbox": influence of environmental structure, intelligence, and working memory load.
  • A. Bröder
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
  • 2003
In 2 experiments with a total of 220 participants, the tendency to use simple heuristics such as the take the best heuristic in an adaptive manner was investigated, supporting the notion of adaptive strategy selection.
Evolution and the Psychology of Thinking: The Debate
D.E. Over, Introduction: The Evolutionary Psychology of Thinking. G.L. Brase, The Allocation System: Using Signal Detection Processes to Regulate Representations in a Multi-modular Mind. L. Fiddick,
Adjusting the Spanner: Testing an Evidence Accumulation Model of Decision Making
Adjusting the Spanner: Testing an Evidence Accumulation Model of Decision Making Ben R. Newell (ben.newell@unsw.edu.au) and Patrick Collins (patrickc@unsw.edu.au) School of Psychology, University of
Re-visions of rationality?
  • B. Newell
  • Psychology
    Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • 2005
SSL: a theory of how people learn to select strategies.
In all 4 studies, the best-performing strategy from the participants' repertoires most accurately predicted the inferences after sufficient learning opportunities, and when testing SSL against 3 models representing extensions of SSL and against an exemplar model assuming a memory-based inference process, the authors found that SSL predicted theinferences most accurately.
Stimulus format and working memory in fast and frugal strategy selection
The necessity of retrieving complex attribute information from long-term memory has been shown to elevate processing costs and boost the use of simple decision heuristics. This effect was confined to
Search strategies in decision making: the success of “success”
Examination of search strategies has tended to focus on choices determined by decision makers' personal preferences among relevant cues, and not on learning cue-criterion relationships. We present an