Cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: the predictive value of conization margin status.

@article{Young2007CervicalAI,
  title={Cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: the predictive value of conization margin status.},
  author={Jennifer Lee Young and Amir Anthony Jazaeri and Jason A Lachance and Mark H. Stoler and William P Irvin and Laurel W. Rice and Willie A Andersen and Susan C. Modesitt},
  journal={American journal of obstetrics and gynecology},
  year={2007},
  volume={197 2},
  pages={195.e1-7; discussion 195.e7-8}
}
OBJECTIVE We evaluated the impact of conization margin status on outcomes of patients diagnosed with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective chart review identified patients at a University hospital from 1988-2006 with adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) on conization. RESULTS Seventy-four patients were included. Median follow-up was 26 months. Twenty-two of 74 patients (30%) had positive margins, 46 patients (62%) had negative margins, and 6 patients had indeterminate… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-9 of 9 extracted citations

Conization using the Shimodaira-Taniguchi procedure for adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology • 2013
View 4 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

The safety of conization in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix

Journal of gynecologic oncology • 2011
View 9 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Predictive value of negative cone margin status for risk of residual disease among women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics • 2012

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…