Central indexes to the citation distribution: a complement to the h-index

@article{DortaGonzlez2011CentralIT,
  title={Central indexes to the citation distribution: a complement to the h-index},
  author={Pablo Dorta-Gonz{\'a}lez and Mar{\'i}a-Isabel Dorta-Gonz{\'a}lez},
  journal={Scientometrics},
  year={2011},
  volume={88},
  pages={729-745}
}
The citation distribution of a researcher shows the impact of their production and determines the success of their scientific career. However, its application in scientific evaluation is difficult due to the bi-dimensional character of the distribution. Some bibliometric indexes that try to synthesize in a numerical value the principal characteristics of this distribution have been proposed recently. In contrast with other bibliometric measures, the biases that the distribution tails provoke… 
EM-index: a new measure to evaluate the scientific impact of scientists
TLDR
The EM-index is proposed, which is the extension of h-index and e-index, which uses the concept of multidimensional h- index to evaluate thescientific impact of individual as well as to compare the scientific impact of two different researchers/scientists.
Assessing the Scientific Impact of Individual Scholars With Multi-Scale H-Index
TLDR
A novel multi-scale h-index (MH-index, or Ma-Huang index) is proposed to comprehensively measure the scientific impact of scholars based on the publication record to be more balanced and fine-grained for evaluating and comparing the scientificimpact of individual scientists.
An approach to the author citation potential: measures of scientific performance which are invariant across scientific fields
TLDR
An empirical application in a set of 120 randomly selected highly productive authors from the CSIC Research Centre (Spain) shows that the ratio between production and impact dimensions is a normalized measure of the citation potential at the level of individual authors.
h-index and its alternative: A Review
TLDR
The main objective of this article is to study all those indicators which have been proposed to evaluate the scientific impact of an individual researcher or a group of researchers.
Identification of Influential Scientists vs. Mass Producers by the Perfectionism Index
TLDR
This article studies an author's citation curve and defines two new areas related to this curve, called "penalty areas", which are exploited to establish new indices, namely PI and XPI, aiming at categorizing researchers in two distinct categories: "influentials" and "mass producers".
An indicator of journal impact that is based on calculating a journal's percentage of highly cited publications
TLDR
This paper empirically compares this indicator with the impact factor and the h-index, considering different time windows and citation percentiles (levels of citation for considering an article as highly cited compared to others in the same year and category).
Theoretical justification of the central area indices and the central interval indices
TLDR
If Zipf’s law is adopted for the citation distribution, it can be shown that the central area indices and the central interval indices have indeed higher values for more selective authors.
Commonly Used Indexes for Assessment of Research Production
In this chapter, selected indicators and indexes (constructed on the basis of research publications and/or on the basis of a set of citations of these publications) are discussed. These indexes are
Beyond Publication Counts – The Impact of Citations and Combined Metrics on the Performance Measurement of German Business Researchers
TLDR
The results from 298 accounting and marketing scholars show that the move from publication to citation counts is a greater step than from citations to the h-indices, and correlations between rankings based on different data sources can be improved by extending beyond publication measures.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 37 REFERENCES
The e-Index, Complementing the h-Index for Excess Citations
TLDR
The e-index, where e 2 represents the ignored excess citations, in addition to the h 2 citations for h-core papers, is proposed, a necessary h-index complement, especially for evaluating highly cited scientists or for precisely comparing the scientific output of a group of scientists having an identical h- index.
A new index for the citation curve of researchers
TLDR
The h-index is introduced, its use is illustrated and it is concluded that the new index provides an added value, since it balances citations and publications through the citation curve.
Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups
TLDR
Characteristics of the statistical correlation between the Hirsch (h-) index and several standard bibliometric indicators are presented, as well as with the results of peer review judgment, which show that the h-index and the bibliometry ‘crown indicator’ both relate in a quite comparable way with peer judgments.
Beyond the Durfee square: Enhancing the h-index to score total publication output
TLDR
It is argued that the hT-index is superior to h, both theoretically (it scores all citations), and because it shows smooth increases from year to year as compared with the irregular jumps seen in h.
Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists
TLDR
It is shown how the h-index can be used to express the broad impact of a scholar’s research output over time in more nuanced fashion than straight citation counts.
Using the h-index to rank influential information scientistss: Brief Communication
TLDR
It is shown how the h-index can be used to express the broad impact of a scholar's research output over time in more nuanced fashion than straight citation counts.
The influence of self-citation corrections on Egghe’s g index
TLDR
The g index was introduced by Leo Egghe as an improvement of Hirsch’s index h for measuring the overall citation record of a set of articles and is proposed to sharpen this g index by excluding the self-citations.
...
...