Cemented-retained vs screw-retained implant restorations: an investigation on 1939 dental implants.

@article{Cicci2008CementedretainedVS,
  title={Cemented-retained vs screw-retained implant restorations: an investigation on 1939 dental implants.},
  author={Marco Cicci{\`u} and Mario Beretta and Giacomo Risitano and Carlo Maiorana},
  journal={Minerva stomatologica},
  year={2008},
  volume={57 4},
  pages={167-79}
}
AIM The aim of this work was to present a comparison of screw-retained and cemented-retained implant prostheses based on a retrospective analysis of 1 939 dental implants. The advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of those two different types of dental restorations are discussed and compared with the recent international literature. It is important to underline the influence of the attachment mechanism on many clinical aspects of implant dentistry. METHODS A group of 527 patients was… CONTINUE READING