• Corpus ID: 88513475

Causal inference for ordinal outcomes

  title={Causal inference for ordinal outcomes},
  author={Alexander Volfovsky and Edoardo M. Airoldi and Donald B. Rubin},
  journal={arXiv: Methodology},
Many outcomes of interest in the social and health sciences, as well as in modern applications in computational social science and experimentation on social media platforms, are ordinal and do not have a meaningful scale. Causal analyses that leverage this type of data, termed ordinal non-numeric, require careful treatment, as much of the classical potential outcomes literature is concerned with estimation and hypothesis testing for outcomes whose relative magnitudes are well defined. Here, we… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Treatment Effects on Ordinal Outcomes: Causal Estimands and Sharp Bounds
Echoing recent advances in the econometrics and biostatistics literature, the sharp bounds of the aforementioned causal parameters for ordinal outcomes are presented, under fixed marginal distributions of the potential outcomes.
Sharp nonparametric bounds and randomization inference for treatment effects on an ordinal outcome
  • Y. Chiba
  • Mathematics
    Statistics in medicine
  • 2017
A numerical method is presented to calculate the sharp nonparametric bounds within a sample, reflecting the impact of confounding, and the use of a causal parameter for an ordinal outcome, defined as the proportion that a potential outcome under one treatment condition would not be smaller than that under the other condition.
On Causal Inference for Ordinal Outcomes
This dissertation studies the problem of causal inference for ordinal outcomes. Chapter 1 focuses on the sharp null hypothesis of no treatment e↵ect on all experimental units, and develops a
Difference-in-Differences for Ordinal Outcomes: Application to the Effect of Mass Shootings on Attitudes toward Gun Control
The difference-in-differences (DID) design is widely used in observational studies to estimate the causal effect of a treatment when repeated observations over time are available. Yet, almost all
How to Make Causal Inferences Using Texts
A conceptual framework for making causal inferences with discovered measures as a treatment or outcome is introduced and this framework enables researchers to discover high-dimensional textual interventions and estimate the ways that observed treatments affect text-based outcomes.
Ordinal probability effect measures for group comparisons in multinomial cumulative link models
An "ordinal superiority" measure summarizes the probability that an observation from one distribution falls above an independent observation from the other distribution, adjusted for explanatory variables in a model.
Causal estimands and confidence intervals associated with Wilcoxon‐Mann‐Whitney tests in randomized experiments
The relationship of the proportional odds parameter to Hand's paradox is explored, showing that the paradox may occur for proportional odds parameters between 1/9 and 9 and large effects are needed to ensure that if treatment appears better by the Mann-Whitney parameter, then treatment improves responses in most individuals.
Evaluation Methods and Measures for Causal Learning Algorithms
This survey provides a comprehensive review of the evaluation of fundamental tasks in causal inference and causality-aware machine learning tasks and seeks to expedite the marriage of causality and machine learning via discussions of prominent open problems and challenges.
The Effect of Peer-to-Peer Risk Information on Potential Migrants - Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial in Senegal
In response to mounting evidence of the dangers of irregular migration from Africa to Europe, the number of information campaigns designed to raise awareness of the potential risks has rapidly
Affiliation Bias in Arbitration: An Experimental Approach
A characteristic feature of arbitration, a growing form of legal adjudication, is that each disputing party appoints an arbitrator. Commentators, however, suggest that party-appointed arbitrators


Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction
Most questions in social and biomedical sciences are causal in nature: what would happen to individuals, or to groups, if part of their environment were changed? In this groundbreaking text, two
Causal Inference Using Potential Outcomes
Causal effects are defined as comparisons of potential outcomes under different treatments on a common set of units. Observed values of the potential outcomes are revealed by the assignment
Causal inference from 2K factorial designs by using potential outcomes
A framework for causal inference from two‐level factorial designs is proposed, which uses potential outcomes to define causal effects. The paper explores the effect of non‐additivity of unit level
Assessing Sensitivity to an Unobserved Binary Covariate in an Observational Study with Binary Outcome
This paper proposes a simple technique for assessing the range of plausible causal con- clusions from observational studies with a binary outcome and an observed categorical covariate. The technique
Extending the rank likelihood for semiparametric copula estimation
Quantitative studies in many fields involve the analysis of multivariate data of diverse types, including measurements that we may consider binary, ordinal and continuous. One approach to the
Nonparametric analysis of treatment effects in ordered response models
Treatment analyses based on average outcomes do not immediately generalize to the case of ordered responses because the expectation of an ordinally measured variable does not exist. The proposed
Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies.
A discussion of matching, randomization, random sampling, and other methods of controlling extraneous variation is presented. The objective is to specify the benefits of randomization in estimating
Statistics and Causal Inference
Abstract Problems involving causal inference have dogged at the heels of statistics since its earliest days. Correlation does not imply causation, and yet causal conclusions drawn from a carefully
Agnostic notes on regression adjustments to experimental data: Reexamining Freedman's critique
Freedman [Adv. in Appl. Math. 40 (2008) 180-193; Ann. Appl. Stat. 2 (2008) 176-196] critiqued ordinary least squares regression adjustment of estimated treatment effects in randomized experiments,