Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality.

@article{Choi1999CausalAA,
  title={Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality.},
  author={Incheol Choi and Richard E. Nisbett and Ara Norenzayan},
  journal={Psychological Bulletin},
  year={1999},
  volume={125},
  pages={47-63}
}
Growing cross-cultural evidence suggests that East Asians are less likely to show the correspondence bias, or a preference for explanations of behavior in terms of traits, dispositions, or other internal attributes of the target. The scope of this evidence spans several research paradigms and diverse methodologies. The cultural difference, however, appears not to be caused by an absence of dispositional thinking in East Asian cultures. Indeed, extensive ethnographic and psychological data… Expand

Figures from this paper

Cultural Variation and Similarities in Cognitive Thinking Styles Versus Judgment Biases: A Review of Environmental Factors and Evolutionary Forces
Cultural psychological research has compellingly demonstrated that reliable East-West differences exist in basic cognitive styles: in contrast to the analytic, focal, linear thinking prevalent in theExpand
Culture, Self-construal and Social Cognition: Evidence from Cross-Cultural and Priming Studies
Members of different cultures vary in basic social psychological processes, such as value orientation, attitudes, attitude-behavior relations, person perception and attribution of observed behavior.Expand
Culture and Causal Cognition
East Asian and American causal reasoning differs significantly. East Asians understand behavior in terms of complex interactions between dispositions of the person or other object and contextualExpand
Culturally based lay beliefs as a tool for understanding intergroup and intercultural relations
Abstract Dialectical thinking represents a constellation of culturally based lay theories about the nature of the world in which social objects are viewed as inherently contradictory, fundamentallyExpand
A cultural task analysis of implicit independence: comparing North America, Western Europe, and East Asia.
TLDR
North Americans are more likely than Western Europeans to exhibit focused attention, experience emotions associated with independence, and associate happiness with personal achievement, according to a new theoretical framework that assigns a key role to cultural tasks. Expand
Current Directions in Psychological Science
East Asian and American causal reasoning differs significantly. East Asians understand behavior in terms of complex interactions between dispositions of the person or other object and contextualExpand
Culture and the construal of agency : Attribution to individual versus group dispositions
The authors argue that cultures differ in implicit theories of individuals and groups. North Americans conceive of individual persons as free agents, whereas East Asians conceptualize them asExpand
Personality: the universal and the culturally specific.
TLDR
Although people everywhere can conceive of each other in terms of personality traits, people in collectivistic cultures appear to rely on traits to a lesser degree when understanding themselves and others, compared with those from individualistic cultures. Expand
The “Ripple Effect”: cultural differences in subjective perceptions of responsibility
Previous research has demonstrated that East Asians make broader causal attributions for behaviors than Westerners. In the current research, it was hypothesized that East Asians would also takeExpand
Motivated cultural cognition: the impact of implicit cultural theories on dispositional attribution varies as a function of need for closure.
The authors propose that need for closure (NFC) leads attributors to respond to an ambiguous social event by increasing reliance on implicit theories received from acculturation. Hence, the influenceExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 164 REFERENCES
Culture and development of everyday social explanation.
  • J. G. Miller
  • Medicine
  • Journal of personality and social psychology
  • 1984
TLDR
Evidence suggests that these cross-cultural and developmental differences result from contrasting cultural conceptions of the person acquired over development in the two cultures rather than from cognitive. Expand
Do people believe behaviours are consistent with attitudes? Towards a cultural psychology of attribution processes.
In individualistic English-speaking cultures such as Australia, the United Kingdom, or the United States, attitudes and behaviours are often believed to be consistent. By contrast, in the JapaneseExpand
Cultural influences on the development of conceptual differentiation in person description
Cultural influences on the development of person/situation and self/other differentiation are examined in a cross-cultural developmental study of person description. Comparison is undertaken of modesExpand
Explaining Real-Life Events: How Culture and Domain Shape Attributions
Several lines of experimental research have shown that attributional styles are affected by the attributor's culture, inferential goals, and level of cognitive processing. Can these findings beExpand
Implicit Theories Individual Differences in the Likelihood and Meaning of Dispositional Inference
In their research, the authors have identified individuals who believe that a particular trait (intelligence, personality, or moral character) is a fixed disposition (entity theorists) and haveExpand
Reasons for the lack of argumentation and debate in the Far East
Abstract This essay examines Chinese and Japanese attitudes towards speech communication, particularly in public settings. Social, linguistic, and philosophical perspectives are used to explain theExpand
Situational Salience and Cultural Differences in the Correspondence Bias and Actor-Observer Bias
Two studies examined the correspondence bias in attitude attributions of Koreans and Americans. Study I employed the classic attitude attribution paradigm of Jones and Harris and found that bothExpand
Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality.
TLDR
Five studies explored the relation between the practices indicative of lay dispositionism and people's implicit theories about the nature of personal attributes and predicted that those who believed that personal attributes are malleable made stronger future behavioral predictions and made stronger trait inferences from behavior. Expand
Does the Concept of the Person Vary Cross-Culturally?
Our concern in this essay is with other people’s conceptions of the person and ideas about the self. Our aim is to interpret a widespread mode of social thought often referred to as concrete,Expand
How Individualists Interpret Behavior: Idiocentrism and Spontaneous Trait Inference
Previous research suggests that people from different cultural backgrounds differ in the extent to which they describe others and explain their behavior in terms of stable dispositions. But little isExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...