• DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.47
• Corpus ID: 39439078

Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality.

@article{Choi1999CausalAA,
  title={Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality.},
  author={Incheol Choi and Richard E. Nisbett and Ara Norenzayan},
  journal={Psychological Bulletin},
  year={1999},
  volume={125},
  pages={47-63}
}

• I. Choi, R. Nisbett, A. Norenzayan
• Published 1999
• Psychology
• Psychological Bulletin

Growing cross-cultural evidence suggests that East Asians are less likely to show the correspondence bias, or a preference for explanations of behavior in terms of traits, dispositions, or other internal attributes of the target. The scope of this evidence spans several research paradigms and diverse methodologies. The cultural difference, however, appears not to be caused by an absence of dispositional thinking in East Asian cultures. Indeed, extensive ethnographic and psychological data indicate that "dispositionism" is a cross-culturally widespread mode of thinking, although East Asians believe dispositions to be more malleable and have a more holistic conception of the person as being situated in a broad social context. The East-West split in attribution thus originates primarily from a stronger "situationism" or belief in the importance of the context of behavior in East Asia. Consequently, East Asians are more likely than Westerners to avoid the correspondence bias as long as situational constraints are salient.