Causal and Logical Necessity in Malebranche's Occasionalism

  title={Causal and Logical Necessity in Malebranche's Occasionalism},
  author={A. R. J. Fisher},
  journal={Canadian Journal of Philosophy},
  pages={523 - 548}
  • A. Fisher
  • Published 1 January 2011
  • Philosophy
  • Canadian Journal of Philosophy
The famous Cartesian Nicolas Malebranche (1638-1715) espoused the occasionalist doctrine that ‘there is only one true cause because there is only one true God; that the nature or power of each thing is nothing but the will of God; that all natural causes are not true causes but only occasional causes’ (LO, 448, original italics). One of Malebranche's well-known arguments for occasionalism, known as, the ‘no necessary connection’ argument (or, NNC) stems from the principle that ‘a true cause… is… 

Samuel Clarke on Agent Causation, Voluntarism, and Occasionalism

Samuel Clarke's account of agent causation provides a philosophical basis for moderate voluntarism, and both leads to and benefits from the acceptance of partial occasionalism as a model of causation for material beings.


CCC) of Malebranche’s arguments why



Necessary Connections and Continuous Creation: Malebranche’s Two Arguments for Occasionalism

Malebranche presents two major arguments for occasionalism: the “no necessary connection” argument (NNC) and the “conservation is but continuous creation” argument (CCC). NNC appears prominently in

Occasionalism and mechanism: Fontenelle's objections to malebranche

It is well known that the French Cartesian Nicolas Malebranche (1638– 1715) was both an occasionalist in metaphysics and a mechanist in physics. He consistently argued that God is the only true

Causation in Early Modern Philosophy: Cartesianism, Occasionalism, and Preestablished Harmony

Three general accounts of causation stand out in early modern philosophy: Cartesian interactionism, occasionalism, and Leibniz's preestablished harmony. The contributors to this volume examine these

Malebranche and Occasional Causes

A weakened version of the doctrine of constant creation according to which God is constantly creating the modifications of things but is not constantly creating things in their entirety.

Malebranche on Causation

Questions about the nature of causality occupy a rather central place in early modern philosophy. There had been, of course, a concern with causality in ancient philosophy (especially Aristotle) and

Causal and Metaphysical Necessity

Any property has two sorts of causal features: “forward-looking” ones, having to do with what its instantiation can contribute to causing, and ldquo;backward-looking” ones, having to do with how its

God's General Concurrence With Secondary Causes: Why Conservation Is Not Enough

The sacred writings of Judaism, Islam, and Christianity proclaim with full voice that God is the transcendent and provident Lord of nature; as the First or Primary Cause, He has created the physical

If not non-cognitivism, then what?

According to Michael Smith, the big issue in metaethics (what he calls “The Moral Problem”) is how to accept the seemingly true premises of Hume’s Motivation Argument while fending off its

The Cambridge companion to Malebranche

Introduction Steven Nadler 1. Malebranche and method Thomas M. Lennon 2. Malebranche on the soul Nicholas Jolley 3. Malebranche on ideas and the vision in God Tad M. Schmaltz 4. The

The Cambridge companion to early modern philosophy

Introduction Donald Rutherford 1. Innovation and orthodoxy in early modern philosophy Donald Rutherford 2. Knowledge, evidence, and method Stephen Gaukroger 3. From natural philosophy to natural