Cauchy's Work on Integral Geometry, Centers of Curvature, and Other Applications of Infinitesimals

@article{Bair2020CauchysWO,
  title={Cauchy's Work on Integral Geometry, Centers of Curvature, and Other
 Applications of Infinitesimals},
  author={Jacques Bair and Piotr Błaszczyk and Peter Heinig and Vladimir Kanovei and Mikhail G. Katz and Thomas Mcgaffey},
  journal={arXiv: History and Overview},
  year={2020}
}
Like his colleagues de Prony, Petit, and Poisson at the Ecole Polytechnique, Cauchy used infinitesimals in the Leibniz-Euler tradition both in his research and teaching. Cauchy applied infinitesimals in an 1826 work in differential geometry where infinitesimals are used neither as variable quantities nor as sequences but rather as numbers. He also applied infinitesimals in an 1832 article on integral geometry, similarly as numbers. We explore these and other applications of Cauchy's… 

Continuity between Cauchy and Bolzano: issues of antecedents and priority

In a paper published in 1970, Grattan-Guinness argued that Cauchy, in his 1821 Cours d'Analyse, may have plagiarized Bolzano's Rein analytischer Beweis (RB), first published in 1817. That paper was

Mathematical Conquerors, Unguru Polarity, and the Task of History

We compare several approaches to the history of mathematics recently proposed by Blasjo, Fraser--Schroter, Fried, and others. We argue that tools from both mathematics and history are essential for a

Equality and Near-Equality in a Nonstandard World

In the context of nonstandard analysis, the somewhat vague equality relation of near-equality allows us to relate objects that are indistinguishable but not necessarily equal. This relation appears

Three case studies in current Leibniz scholarship

We examine some recent scholarship on Leibniz’s philosophy of the infinitesimal calculus. We indicate difficulties that arise in articles by Bassler, Knobloch, and Arthur, due to a denial to

A two-track tour of Cauchy's Cours

Cauchy published his Cours d’Analyse 200 years ago. We analyze Cauchy’s take on the concepts of rigor, continuity, and limit, and explore a pair of approaches in the literature to the meaning of his

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 51 REFERENCES

Infinitely small quantities in Cauchy's textbooks

Cauchy’s Cours d’analyse: An Annotated Translation

On real functions..- On infinitely small and infinitely large quantities, and on the continuity of functions. Singular values of functions in various particular cases..- On symmetric functions and

Interpreting the Infinitesimal Mathematics of Leibniz and Euler

Abstract We apply Benacerraf’s distinction between mathematical ontology and mathematical practice (or the structures mathematicians use in practice) to examine contrasting interpretations of

Who Gave You the Cauchy–Weierstrass Tale? The Dual History of Rigorous Calculus

Cauchy’s contribution to the foundations of analysis is often viewed through the lens of developments that occurred some decades later, namely the formalisation of analysis on the basis of the

The origins of Cauchy's rigorous calculus

This book explores the background of a major intellectual revolution: the rigorous reinterpretation of the calculus undertaken by Augustin-Louis Cauchy and his contemporaries in the first part of the

Cauchy's Continuum

Cauchy's sum theorem of 1821 has been the subject of rival interpretations ever since Robinson proposed a novel reading in the 1960s. Some claim that Cauchy modified the hypothesis of his theorem in

Toward a History of Mathematics Focused on Procedures

TLDR
The proposed formalisations indicate that Robinson’s framework is more helpful in understanding the procedures of the pioneers of mathematical analysis than a Weierstrassian framework, but this does not mean that Fermat, Gregory, Leibniz, Euler, and Cauchy were pre-Robinsonians.

Approaches to analysis with infinitesimals following Robinson, Nelson, and others

This is a survey of several approaches to the framework for working with infinitesimals and infinite numbers, originally developed by Abraham Robinson in the 1960s, and their constructive engagement

Leibniz�s well-founded fictions and their interpetations

Leibniz used the term fiction in conjunction with infinitesimals. What kind of fictions they were exactly is a subject of scholarly dispute. The position of Bos and Mancosu contrasts with that of

Fermat, Leibniz, Euler, and the gang: The true history of the concepts of limit and shadow

Fermat, Leibniz, Euler, and Cauchy all used one or another form of approximate equality, or the idea of discarding "negligible" terms, so as to obtain a correct analytic answer. Their inferential
...