Case of Barrios Altos and La Cantuta v. Peru

@article{Contesse2019CaseOB,
  title={Case of Barrios Altos and La Cantuta v. Peru},
  author={Jorge Contesse},
  journal={American Journal of International Law},
  year={2019},
  volume={113},
  pages={568 - 574}
}
  • J. Contesse
  • Published 1 July 2019
  • Political Science, Law
  • American Journal of International Law
On May 30, 2018, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Court) ordered Peru to review the presidential pardon granted to former president and dictator Alberto Fujimori, who had been convicted and imprisoned for his role in serious human rights violations. The Peruvian Supreme Court obliged and, after examining the merits of the presidential pardon through a special procedure set up to assess the pardon's conformity with international human rights law, invalidated the pardon, effectively… 
2 Citations
The control of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights over amnesty laws and other exemption measures: Legitimacy assessment
Abstract In 2001, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) seminally found self-amnesty laws on serious human rights violations to be null and void. However, later national reactions showed
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) vis-à-vis amnesties and pardons: factors concerning or affecting the degree of ECtHR’s deference to states
States have adopted amnesties/pardons concerning serious human rights violations to transition from crises, dictatorships, or conflicts worldwide, including Europe. Although the ECtHR has yet to

References

SHOWING 1-6 OF 6 REFERENCES
Guilty as Charged: The Trial of Former Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori for Human Rights Violations
On 7 April 2009, Alberto Fujimori, president of Peru from 1990 to 2000, was found guilty of grave human rights violations and sentenced to 25 years in prison - the maximum penalty allowed by Peruvian
A Full Stop to Amnesty in Argentina The Simón Case
In Simon, the Argentine Supreme Court held that two amnesty laws, adopted in the late 1980s in order to shield authors of serious human rights violations committed during the so-called `Dirty War`
The final word? Constitutional dialogue and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
In this Article, I discuss the ways in which the Inter-American Court of Human Rights addresses cases adopting a novel approach to legal adjudication — one that relies on domestic notions of
The Supreme Court and the Application of International Law: An Encouraging Process
  • Estudios Constitucionales
  • 2009