Carnap and logical truth

@article{Quine2004CarnapAL,
  title={Carnap and logical truth},
  author={W. V. Quine},
  journal={Synthese},
  year={2004},
  volume={12},
  pages={350-374}
}
  • W. Quine
  • Published 1 December 1960
  • Philosophy
  • Synthese
Kant’s question ‘How are synthetic judgments a priori possible?’ precipitated the Critique of Pure Reason. Question and answer notwithstanding, Mill and others persisted in doubting that such judgments were possible at all. At length some of Kant’s own clearest purported instances, drawn from arithmetic, were sweepingly disqualified (or so it seemed; but see § II) by Frege’s reduction of arithmetic to logic. Attention was thus forced upon the less tendentious and indeed logically prior question… 
The Conventional and the Analytic
Empiricist philosophers like Carnap invoked analyticity in order to explain a priori knowledge and necessary truth. Analyticity was ‘‘truth purely in virtue of meaning.’’ The view had a deflationary
Philosophy of Logic
Our goal over these two quarters is to think through a series of positions on the nature of logical truth. Our central focus will be on the relevant versions of the most fundamental metaphysical and
Ordinary Empirical Judgments and our Scientific Knowledge: An Extension of Reformed Empiricism to the Philosophy of Science
ion, no matter how natural and useful such abstractions may be.37 If one joins Mach in reading the laws as expressions of
Revisiting Quine on Truth by Convention
TLDR
It is argued that positing syntactic rules of inference as part of the authors' linguistic competence follows from the same methodology that leads contemporary linguists and cognitive scientists to posit rules of phonology, morphology, and grammar.
Quine's challenge and Logical Pluralism
‌ A number of deviant deductive systems have been proposed which differ in some way from classical logic. An influential philosophical interpretation of plurality in logic has been developed by
Disagreement about logic
ABSTRACT What do we disagree about when we disagree about logic? On the face of it, classical and nonclassical logicians disagree about the laws of logic and the nature of logical properties. Yet,
ANALYTICITY AND LANGUAGE ENGINEERING IN CARNAP'S LOGICAL SYNTAX
One of the most important events in early analytic philosophy was the analyticity debate between Carnap and Quine. By analyzing this debate, much can be learnt about Carnap’s logical empiricism at
Carnap’s dream: Gödel, Wittgenstein, and Logical, Syntax
TLDR
The breakthrough of January 1931 consists in the rejection of the Tractatus theory in favor of the meta-mathematical perspective of Hilbert, Gödel, and Tarski and led naturally to Carnap’s mature philosophy, in which the inconsistencies between this first view and the principle of tolerance were overcome.
In Carnap’s Defense: A survey on the concept of a linguistic framework in Carnap’s philosophy
The main task in this paper is to detail and investigate Carnap’s conception of a “linguistic framework”(LF). On this basis, we will see whether Carnap’s dichotomies, such as the analytic-synthetic
The logical and the analytic
TLDR
This paper considers various objections to Carnap’s logical syntax definition of ’logical expression’, including those by Saunders Mac Lane and W. V. O. Quine, and considers what Carnaps assumptions must have been in framing his definition and to assess how much damage is caused by this failure of Carnap's definition.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-2 OF 2 REFERENCES
From a Logical Point of View
TLDR
It is the wish of the author to keep general terms distinct from abstract singular terms, so that the over-all dis­ pensability of some assumption that has always rankled as ad hoc and unintuitive is discovered.