Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility

@article{Harsanyi1955CardinalWI,
  title={Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility},
  author={J. Harsanyi},
  journal={Journal of Political Economy},
  year={1955},
  volume={63},
  pages={309 - 321}
}
  • J. Harsanyi
  • Published 1955
  • Journal of Political Economy
  • I T HE naive concept of social welfare as a sum of intuitively measurable and comparable individual cardinal utilities has been found unable to withstand the methodological criticism of the Pareto school. Professor Bergson2 has therefore recommended its replacement by the more general concept of a social welfare function, defined as an arbitrary mathematical function of economic (and other social) variables, of a form freely chosen according to one's personal ethical (or political) value… CONTINUE READING
    46 Citations
    WELFARISM AND FAIRNESS
    Utilitarianism, Voting And The Redistribution Of Income
    • PDF
    Consistent updating of social welfare functions
    • T. Hayashi
    • Economics, Computer Science
    • Soc. Choice Welf.
    • 2016
    • 3
    • PDF
    Harsanyi's 'utilitarian theorem' and utilitarianism
    • 21
    • PDF
    Utilitarianism and interpersonal comparison
    • Y. Ng
    • Sociology, Economics
    • 1992
    • 15
    • PDF
    Temi Di Discussione Introduction to Social Choice and Welfare Introduction to Social Choice and Welfare
    • Highly Influenced
    Equally-distributed equivalent utility, ex post egalitarianism and utilitarianism
    • 24
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    The Social Cost of Carbon: Valuing Inequality, Risk, and Population for Climate Policy
    • 8
    • PDF