Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk-taking

@article{Harsanyi1953CardinalUI,
  title={Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk-taking},
  author={John C. Harsanyi},
  journal={Journal of Political Economy},
  year={1953},
  volume={61},
  pages={434 - 435}
}
  • J. Harsanyi
  • Published 1 October 1953
  • Journal of Political Economy
FROM most branches of economics the concept of cardinal utility has been eliminated as redundant since ordinal utility has been found to suffice for doing the job. Cardinal utility has been kept only in welfare economics to support the demand for a more equal income distribution. Recently, however, the concept of cardinal utility has been introduced also in the theory of choices involving risk.1 The question naturally arises whether the concepts of cardinal utility used in these two parts of… 
Preferences over income distribution: Evidence from a choice experiment
Abstract Using a choice experiment in the lab, we assess the relative importance of different attitudes to income inequality. We elicit subjects’ preferences regarding pairs of payoff distributions
Utilitarianism with and without expected utility
We give two social aggregation theorems under conditions of risk, one for constant population cases, the other an extension to variable populations. Intra and interpersonal comparisons are encoded in
On Measuring Welfare ‘Behind a Veil of Ignorance’
TLDR
The Rawlsian maximin criterion is shown to be robust to extending the set of utilities that constitutes “society” to all risk-averse utilities, while the geometric-mean criterion is not as robust.
A soul's view of the optimal population problem
TLDR
This work considers the population problem in an environment where population is variable, but there is a fixed supply of souls, who may experience multiple incarnations over time and argues that such comparisons are possible on the basis of introspection and lead to intuitive welfare criteria with attractive properties.
Twofold optimality of the relative utilitarian bargaining solution
  • M. Pivato
  • Mathematics, Computer Science
    Soc. Choice Welf.
  • 2009
TLDR
It is shown that RU is “optimal” in two very different senses: first, RU is the maximal element (over the set of all bargaining solutions) under any partial ordering which satisfies certain axioms of fairness and consistency, and second, RU offers each person the maximum expected utility amongst all rescaling-invariant solutions.
Welfare Analysis with Heterogeneous Risk Preferences
  • Maya Eden
  • Economics
    Journal of Political Economy
  • 2020
How much should society be willing to pay for reducing inequality? The standard approach to this normative question relates inequality aversion to risk aversion by treating inequality as an outcome
Rawls’s difference principle and maximin rule of allocation: a new analysis
If Rawls’s A Theory of Justice has achieved fame among economists, this is due to his Difference Principle, which says that inequalities of resources should be to the benefit of the less fortunate,
Health Risk, Inequality Indexes, and Environmental Justice
TLDR
It is argued that equally distributed equivalents (EDEs) are well‐suited for this purpose since they account for levels and dispersion of outcome distributions, and how these tools can inform an environmental justice analysis of a proposed Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule addressing indoor air pollution.
A Unified Perspective on Efficiency, Redistribution, and Public Policy
Specialized theoretical and empirical research should in principle be embedded in a unified framework that identifies the relevant interactions among different phenomena, enables an appropriate
Fair Intergenerational Utilitarianism: Risk, its Resolution Over Time, and Discounting
The paper reexamines the welfare economics of intergenerational risk. Risk and its resolution over time are modeled as a decision tree: in each period, the consumption of the current one-period
...
1
2
3
4
5
...