Carbon payback period and carbon offset parity point of wood pellet production in the South‐eastern United States

@article{Jonker2014CarbonPP,
  title={Carbon payback period and carbon offset parity point of wood pellet production in the South‐eastern United States},
  author={Jan Gerrit Geurt Jonker and Martin Junginger and Andr{\'e} Faaij},
  journal={GCB Bioenergy},
  year={2014},
  volume={6}
}
This study examines the effect of methodological choices to determine the carbon payback time and the offset parity point for wood pellet production from softwood plantations in the South‐eastern United States. Using the carbon accounting model GORCAM we model low‐, medium‐ and high‐intensity plantation management scenarios for a single stand level, an increasing stand level and a landscape level. Other variables are the fossil‐fuel reference system and the electrical conversion efficiency. Due… 
The ‘debt’ is in the detail: A synthesis of recent temporal forest carbon analyses on woody biomass for energy
The temporal imbalance between the release and sequestration of forest carbon has raised a fundamental concern about the climate mitigation potential of forest biomass for energy. The potential
Simulation of forest‐based carbon balances for Germany: a contribution to the‘carbon debt’ debate
The aim of this paper is to estimate the future carbon balance of wood use in Germany combining a national forest inventory data‐driven forest growth model with information about German harvested
Carbon debt repayment or carbon sequestration parity? Lessons from a forest bioenergy case study in Ontario, Canada
Forest bioenergy can contribute to climate change mitigation by reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with energy production. We assessed changes in GHG emissions resulting from
Paying for What You Get: Accounting for the Nonrenewable Component in Wood to Energy
Abstract Growing international trade in wood pellets is one response to regional efforts to mitigate the global problem of climate change. With this growing use of wood energy, there is increased
Range and uncertainties in estimating delays in greenhouse gas mitigation potential of forest bioenergy sourced from Canadian forests
Accurately assessing the delay before the substitution of fossil fuel by forest bioenergy starts having a net beneficial impact on atmospheric CO2 is becoming important as the cost of delaying GHG
Carbon balance indicator for forest bioenergy scenarios
A carbon (C) balance indicator is presented for the evaluation of forest bioenergy scenarios as a means to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. A bioenergy‐intensive scenario with a greater harvest
Exploring the limits to sustainable pellet production for international markets: The impact of increasing pellet production in the US Southeast on feedstock use, production cost and carbon sequestration in forest areas
With rising demand for wood pellets from the US Southeast (US SE), the environmental limits to additional biomass demand are increasingly questioned. This study analyses the impact of increased
Forest Sustainability and Carbon Balance of EU Importation of North American Forest Biomass for Bioenergy Production
The context Biomass for energy plays a significant role in the EU renewable energy picture, with bioenergy expected to remain a key strategy for both the near and long term. Although biomass supplies
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 68 REFERENCES
Carbon debt and carbon sequestration parity in forest bioenergy production
The capacity for forests to aid in climate change mitigation efforts is substantial but will ultimately depend on their management. If forests remain unharvested, they can further mitigate the
International bioenergy transport costs and energy balance
The Carbon Budget of the Canadian Forest Sector: Phase I
TLDR
An assessment of the contribution of Canadian forest ecosystems and forestry activities to the global carbon budget has been undertaken, with the development of a computer modeling framework and the use of pub lished information to establish the sector's current role as a net source or a net sink of atmospheric carbon.
Fixing a Critical Climate Accounting Error
TLDR
Rules for applying the Kyoto Protocol and national cap-and-trade laws contain a major, but fixable, carbon accounting flaw in assessing bioenergy, which erroneously treats all bioenergy as carbon neutral regardless of the source of the biomass.
Goodbye to carbon neutral: Getting biomass footprints right
The role of forest and bioenergy strategies in the global carbon cycle
CBM-CFS3: A model of carbon-dynamics in forestry and land-use change implementing IPCC standards
Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels.
TLDR
This work integrates life cycle assessment (LCA) and forest carbon analysis to assess total GHG emissions of forest bioenergy over time and suggests the integrated LCA/forest carbon approach be undertaken for bioenergy studies.
Harvesting in boreal forests and the biofuel carbon debt
Owing to the extensive critique of food-crop-based biofuels, attention has turned toward second-generation wood-based biofuels. A question is therefore whether timber taken from the vast boreal
...
...